1990
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(90)85311-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of size-quantized indium phosphide in zeolite cages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the In(6)-In(2) distance (2.759(3) and 2.754(5) Å for crystals 1 and 2, respectively) is reasonable, comparable to 2.70 Å, the sum of the atomic radius of In 0 and the ionic radius of In 2+ (1.03 Å). The association of In 0 at In (6) with In(2) supports the rather longer approach distances of In 2+ at In(2) to the six-ring oxygens, due to the reduced cationic character of In 2+ . These reasonable distances between In 0 and In 2+ indicate that clusters such as (In 2 ) 2+ , (In 3 ) 4+ (linear or bent), (In 4 ) 6+ , or (In 5 ) 8+ (four In 2+ ions tetrahedrally arranged in the sodalite unit with an In 0 at their center) exist.…”
Section: Indium Atoms and Clustersmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, the In(6)-In(2) distance (2.759(3) and 2.754(5) Å for crystals 1 and 2, respectively) is reasonable, comparable to 2.70 Å, the sum of the atomic radius of In 0 and the ionic radius of In 2+ (1.03 Å). The association of In 0 at In (6) with In(2) supports the rather longer approach distances of In 2+ at In(2) to the six-ring oxygens, due to the reduced cationic character of In 2+ . These reasonable distances between In 0 and In 2+ indicate that clusters such as (In 2 ) 2+ , (In 3 ) 4+ (linear or bent), (In 4 ) 6+ , or (In 5 ) 8+ (four In 2+ ions tetrahedrally arranged in the sodalite unit with an In 0 at their center) exist.…”
Section: Indium Atoms and Clustersmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Full-matrix least-squares refinements (SHELXL97) 47 Introducing In(U) as In 0 atoms at a peak (0.125,0.125,0.125) from a difference Fourier function reduced R 1 to 0.46 with resulting occupancies of 22.8(2) and 4.6(5) at In(II) and In(U), respectively. Adding In(I′) isotropically as In 2+ at another peak (0.063,0.063,0.063) found in a subsequent difference function converged with R 1 sharply reduced to 0.063 with resulting occupancies of 25.9(4), 8.0(1), and 32.4(4) at In(II), In(U), and In(I′), respectively. Including In(IIa) isotropically as In 2+ at a peak (0.23,0.23,0.23) found in a difference function based on this model converged and further reduced R 1 to 0.062 with occupancies of 25.0(4), 7.9(1), 31.7(3), and 0.8(2) at In(II), In(U), In(I′), and In(IIa), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Including In(IIa) isotropically as In 2+ at a peak (0.23,0.23,0.23) found in a difference function based on this model converged and further reduced R 1 to 0.062 with occupancies of 25.0(4), 7.9(1), 31.7(3), and 0.8(2) at In(II), In(U), In(I′), and In(IIa), respectively. All In positions were refined anisotropically in the final cycles of refinement with occupancies fixed at 25,8,32, and 1 at In(II), In(U), In(I′), and In(IIa), respectively. This converged to the final error index R 1 ) 0.058.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional aqueous ion exchange using In(NO 3 ) 3 has been used to introduce the In 3+ into the ammonium forms of ZSM-5 [15,16] and mordenite [17]. This could not be extended to zeolites with higher Al contents because of the loss of crystallinity that occurs at the low pH values required to keep In 3+ in solution [18,19].…”
Section: Vapor Phase Ion Exchange (Vpie)mentioning
confidence: 99%