2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra04248e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of organic–inorganic hybrid membranes with superior antifouling property by incorporating polymer-modified multiwall carbon nanotubes

Abstract: Schematic illustration of (a) the polymerization of dopamine, and (b) preparation of the PVP-modified MWCNTs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modification layer of pDA-f-TiO2 significantly reduced the membrane pore size according to the SEM analysis and remarkably improved the membrane selectivity. The hydrophilicity and permeate flux have been improved after coating for different intervals (15,30,60 and 120 min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modification layer of pDA-f-TiO2 significantly reduced the membrane pore size according to the SEM analysis and remarkably improved the membrane selectivity. The hydrophilicity and permeate flux have been improved after coating for different intervals (15,30,60 and 120 min).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of membranes including reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF), and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes have been modified with pDA coating through hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking, the action of van der Waals forces and chelation [28]. This allows the grafting of different polymeric functional groups with their antifouling moieties such as zwitterionic polymers, hyper-branched polyglycerol and nanomaterials [29][30][31][32][33][34]. Kasemset et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown from the Figure 2e,f, as expected, the morphology of the top layer of both membranes were similar, due to the absence of carbon fibers in this layer. The permeability of membrane materials is closely related to its morphology, porosity and wetability [32]. Thus, we compared the difference in roughness between a Car-PES membrane and a PES membrane using the AFM technique.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Car-pes Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permeability of membrane materials is closely related to its morphology, porosity and wetability [32]. Thus, we compared the difference in roughness between a Car-PES membrane and a PES membrane using the AFM technique.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Car-pes Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process was operated at 0.10 MPa for 90 min. Permeation flux (J) and rejection (R) can be calculated according to Equations (2) and (3) [37]:…”
Section: Filtration Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%