2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2004.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of microcrystals by in situ micronization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since particles are prepared directly in the micronized state (21) and the newly formed microcrystal surface is simultaneously stabilized by a stabilizer (usually a polymer), particles have a much lower tendency for crystal growth and agglomeration (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since particles are prepared directly in the micronized state (21) and the newly formed microcrystal surface is simultaneously stabilized by a stabilizer (usually a polymer), particles have a much lower tendency for crystal growth and agglomeration (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] For example, in many applications the shape and size of particles must be carefully controlled to ensure that product performance is consistent from batch to batch. 12,[14][15][16] Furthermore, while the process of generating a desired particle size and morphology profile in a batch of material has traditionally been performed post crystallization through techniques such as milling and micronisation, 17,18 it is more desirable to gain sufficient control of the crystallization step such that crystals with optimum characteristics are grown directly. [18][19][20] For these reasons, focus has recently been directed to gaining further control and understanding of crystallization processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional approaches to produce untrafine drug particles can be divided into top-down and bottom-up techniques (Keck and Müller 2006;Rabinow 2004). In the case of top-down techniques which include jet-milling, pear/ball milling and high pressure homogenising, the bulk drugs are comminuted into micro or nano-sized range using mechanical force (Rasenack et al 2004). However, these techniques need high energy input and exhibit some disadvantages in practice such as contamination of drugs, variation of crystal structures, uncontrolled particle morphology, and broad particle size distribution (Keck and Müller 2006;Kharb et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques need high energy input and exhibit some disadvantages in practice such as contamination of drugs, variation of crystal structures, uncontrolled particle morphology, and broad particle size distribution (Keck and Müller 2006;Kharb et al 2006). In the last decade, bottomup techniques that rely on dissolving the drug in a solvent and precipitating it by the addition of a non-solvent, like supercritical fluid (SCF) technique and liquid precipitation, have been widely investigated to obtain ultrafine drug particles, such as cephradine (Zhong et al 2005), cefuroxime axetil (Zhang et al 2006), danazol (Rogers et al 2002;Zhao et al 2007), ibuprofen (Rasenack et al 2004), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%