2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2011.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose phthalate nanoparticles with mixed solvent using supercritical antisolvent process and its application in co-precipitation of insulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, SCF is used as an antisolvent that causes precipitation of the protein. Several examples of nano‐ and micro‐particles have been reported, including insulin and α‐chymotrypsin, although varying degrees of stability have been reported. SAS processes have also been considered for the production of protein‐loaded microparticles by co‐precipitation of the biodegradable polymer and the protein from an organic cosolvent .…”
Section: Supercritical Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, SCF is used as an antisolvent that causes precipitation of the protein. Several examples of nano‐ and micro‐particles have been reported, including insulin and α‐chymotrypsin, although varying degrees of stability have been reported. SAS processes have also been considered for the production of protein‐loaded microparticles by co‐precipitation of the biodegradable polymer and the protein from an organic cosolvent .…”
Section: Supercritical Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixed solvent method was employed to enable the simultaneous achievement of facilitated preparation for nanoscale particles, 38 and a high concentration of a hydrophobic drug (etoposide) could be made since ethanol was involved. Citric acid was used here as a crystal modifier to control the selectivity of polymorph and crystal morphology during the process of mineralization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 Regenerated pure cellulose nanospheres were prepared from analogous processes using cellulose solutions, such as 50% w/w n-methylmorpholine-n-oxide, and NaOH/urea, while the supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process, based on the nanoprecipitation mechanism, was employed to prepare derivatized cellulose nanospheres. [38][39][40]63 Wondraczek et al compared conventional solvent evaporation with nanoprecipitation by characterizing the resulting nanospheres. 19 Both methods produced narrow reproducible dispersions of spherical nanoparticles.…”
Section: Dispersion-based Methods For Cellulose Nanoparticle Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][62][63][64] Size distribution is particularly important, since narrower distributions favor control of secondary properties such as controllable release rates. Successful nanosphere applications meeting expected performance criteria require largely empirical correlations between measured particle properties and responses in specific applications.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Cellulose-based Nanospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%