2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of highly monodisperse W/O emulsions with hydrophobically modified SPG membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean particle size was expressed as the number-average mean diameter, d av and the polydispersity was expressed as the coefficient of variation, CV = (σ/d av ) × 100, where σ is the standard deviation of particle diameters in a suspension. A smaller CV or PDI value indicates the narrower size distribution [20,21]. All values of the mean particle size and PDI or CV are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.…”
Section: Characterization Of Liposomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean particle size was expressed as the number-average mean diameter, d av and the polydispersity was expressed as the coefficient of variation, CV = (σ/d av ) × 100, where σ is the standard deviation of particle diameters in a suspension. A smaller CV or PDI value indicates the narrower size distribution [20,21]. All values of the mean particle size and PDI or CV are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.…”
Section: Characterization Of Liposomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobic membranes are needed to produce water-in-oil (W/O) (Cheng et al, 2008;Jing et al, 2006) and oil-in-water-in-oil (O/W/O) (Wei et al, 2013) emulsions and hydrophilic membranes are required to prepare oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) (Vladisavljević et al, 2014) emulsions. The advantages of PME over DME are in smaller droplet sizes and higher transmembrane fluxes that can be achieved for any given pore size and higher dispersed phase content that can be obtained (up to 60 vol% in simple PME and up to 90 vol% in PME with phase inversion (Suzuki et al, 1999)).…”
Section: Membrane Emulsificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In premix membrane emulsification (PME) (Figure 1b), a pre-emulsion is pressed through the membrane (Suzuki et al, 1996) or a packed bed of uniform particles (van der Zwan et al, 2008;Yasuda et al, 2010;Laouini et al, 2014), which leads to homogenisation of existing coarse droplets. If the transmembrane pressure is lower than the capillary pressure, the pressure force acting on a droplet will not be able to squeeze the droplet through a pore, which will lead to the separation of the pre-emulsion into a dropletfree continuous phase and concentrated emulsion (Koltuniewicz et al, 1995; Park et al, 1998).Hydrophobic membranes are needed to produce water-in-oil (W/O) (Cheng et al, 2008;Jing et al, 2006) and oil-in-water-in-oil (O/W/O) (Wei et al, 2013) emulsions and hydrophilic membranes are required to prepare oil-in-water (O/W) and water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) (Vladisavljević et al, 2014) emulsions. The advantages of PME over DME are in smaller droplet sizes and higher transmembrane fluxes that can be achieved for any given pore size and higher dispersed phase content that can be obtained (up to 60 vol% in simple PME and up to 90 vol% in PME with phase inversion (Suzuki et al, 1999)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DME, one liquid (a dispersed phase) is injected through a microporous membrane into another immiscible liquid (the continuous phase) (Nakashima et al, 1991) leading to the formation of droplets at the membrane/continuous phase interface (Figure 2a). Hydrophobic membranes are needed to produce water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions (Cheng et al, 2008;Jing et al, 2006), and hydrophilic membranes are required to prepare oilin-water (O/W) emulsions (Figure 2a). In membrane microbubbling, a pressurised gas is forced through a hydrophilic membrane into aqueous continuous phase, leading to the formation of microbubbles (1 m < d bubble < 1 mm) or nanobubbles (d bubble <1 m), depending on the pore size of the membrane (Figure 2b).…”
Section: Membrane Dispersion Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%