2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of biomimetic three-dimensional gelatin/montmorillonite–chitosan scaffold for tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This structure is formed by an initial liquid-liquid phase separation forming the vertical channels while localised depletion of the polymer from the solution ahead of an additional phase separation front leads to the creation of the horizontal tubular pores [46]. Furthermore, the structure for the neat PVA/PAA foam featured much smaller pores compared to the foam with 10wt.% sepiolite clay, which agrees with the results for chitosan/titania and poly(Llactic) acid/bioglass nanocomposite foams [47,48] but in contradiction to the work for polyurethane/fluor-hydroxyapatite [49], gelatin/sepiolite [38] as well as gelatin/ montmorillonite/chitosan nanocomposite foams [50]. Pore size and pore structure are controlled by the ice crystals formed during the freeze-drying process, which are dependent on the freezing and drying conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Morphologiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This structure is formed by an initial liquid-liquid phase separation forming the vertical channels while localised depletion of the polymer from the solution ahead of an additional phase separation front leads to the creation of the horizontal tubular pores [46]. Furthermore, the structure for the neat PVA/PAA foam featured much smaller pores compared to the foam with 10wt.% sepiolite clay, which agrees with the results for chitosan/titania and poly(Llactic) acid/bioglass nanocomposite foams [47,48] but in contradiction to the work for polyurethane/fluor-hydroxyapatite [49], gelatin/sepiolite [38] as well as gelatin/ montmorillonite/chitosan nanocomposite foams [50]. Pore size and pore structure are controlled by the ice crystals formed during the freeze-drying process, which are dependent on the freezing and drying conditions (e.g.…”
Section: Morphologiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In comparison with previous studies, [31,49,55,63] it can be concluded that the CS-Gel/nHA-PANI scaffold-containing PANI as a conducting polymer showed absolutely non-toxic effects in vitro, and also its properties can be controlled by synergetic effect of nHA and PANI.…”
Section: Cell Viability Studiesmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Also the chains of gelatin, a hydrophilic polymer (presence of amide and carboxyl groups), hydrolyse quickly in the presence of water. [55] In CS-Gel/nHA composite scaffold, the degradation was decreased by the addition of nHA compared to the CS-Gel matrix. This is due to the reduction of the accessibility of buffer media to the attacking sites in polysaccharide molecules.…”
Section: In Vitro Biodegradation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…225 A similar behaviour was found in silicate-based hybrids, for instance in the assembly of silk fibroin to wollastonite, a calcium silicate mineral, resulting in a biohybrid material with higher bioactivity than the pristine protein scaffold. 226 Following a blocks-assembly approach, layered silicates of the smectite family [227][228][229] or fibrous clays such as sepiolite 215,223,230 have been explored as the inorganic reinforcing component of biohybrids, in an attempt to develop new materials mimicking natural bone or similar tissues. Recent examples reveal different roles of the silicate platelets or fibres in the resulting biohybrids.…”
Section: Structural Proteins-based Silica and Silicate Biohybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 MPa. 226,227,229 Gelatin-silica biohybrids were also processed as porous scaffolds, showing a bimodal distribution of pores (Fig. 11), and successfully tested for in vitro cell culture, 232,233 but none of these studies report on the mechanical properties of these materials.…”
Section: Structural Proteins-based Silica and Silicate Biohybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%