2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2067(14)60124-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of Bi-doped TiO2 nanoparticles and their visible light photocatalytic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described, the cationic doping essentially introduces the intra-band energy levels close to the CB of TiO 2 , which leads to the red shift in the optical property of the system and it is also observed in various cations such as transition metal, [61][62][63], rare-earth [64][65][66], and other metals [67][68][69] doped TiO 2 . However, the main drawback of the cation doping is the creation of more trapping sites for charge carriers (both electrons and holes) that considerably reduces the efficiency of the photocatalyst.…”
Section: Cationic Doping In Tiomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As described, the cationic doping essentially introduces the intra-band energy levels close to the CB of TiO 2 , which leads to the red shift in the optical property of the system and it is also observed in various cations such as transition metal, [61][62][63], rare-earth [64][65][66], and other metals [67][68][69] doped TiO 2 . However, the main drawback of the cation doping is the creation of more trapping sites for charge carriers (both electrons and holes) that considerably reduces the efficiency of the photocatalyst.…”
Section: Cationic Doping In Tiomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Compared to nonmetal dopant, substitution of metal ions can introduce an intraband state close to CB edge, which results in an obvious red shift in bandgap adsorption due to sub-band gap energies, such as transition metal doping [154][155][156], rare-earth metal doping [157][158][159], and other metal doping [160][161][162].…”
Section: Metal Dopantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon may be due to that the absorption intensity exhibited Fe/N/Co–TiO 2 in the ultraviolet region was higher than that of visible light (according to the UV-Vis results above). Furthermore, the energy of ultraviolet light is higher than that of visible light, and it is easier to generate more photoelectrons for photocatalytic reaction when Fe/N/Co–TiO 2 is irradiated [56]. It is obvious that photocatalytic coating is effective at degrading the main harmful gas in VE under visible light irradiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%