2012
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.201100477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of a Xanthine Sensor Based on the Immobilization of Xanthine Oxidase on a Chitosan Modified Electrode by Cross‐linking

Abstract: Here in this paper, xanthine oxidase (XOD) was immobilized onto the chitosan (CHT) modified electrode by a simple way of cross-linking with glutaraldehyde (GTD) and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (KH). The electrode displayed a sharp peak to the oxidation of xanthine at a potential about 0.67 V and the optimum of pH for determination was investigated. Under the optimum conditions, the biosensor fabricated on the KH/GTD/XOD/CHT modified electrode showed excellent response to the oxidation of xanthine within the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the amperometric response during interferent and xanthine injections, along with corresponding calculated selectivity coefficients, support that the adaptation to xanthine is also produces selective response (Supplementary Materials, Figure SM-7). The performance of the xanthine sensor is comparable to reports in the literature for other xanthine sensing systems [59,60,61,62,63,64,65] compiled and provided in Supplementary Materials (Table SM-1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Similarly, the amperometric response during interferent and xanthine injections, along with corresponding calculated selectivity coefficients, support that the adaptation to xanthine is also produces selective response (Supplementary Materials, Figure SM-7). The performance of the xanthine sensor is comparable to reports in the literature for other xanthine sensing systems [59,60,61,62,63,64,65] compiled and provided in Supplementary Materials (Table SM-1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Because of the significant role of carbon nanomaterials in biological field [25][26][27], which are widely used as electrodes in biosensors [28]. Graphene composite electrodes [29][30][31][32], multiwall carbon nanotube electrodes [33][34][35], and glassy carbon electrodes [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] are used for improving the simultaneous determination of HX, XA, and UA with electrochemical methods. These carbon-based electrodes exhibit high selectivity, excellent sensitivity, good reproducibility, stability, and accuracy in the measurement of HX, XA, and UA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these CV results are provided in Supporting Information (Figures S12–S14) and confirm their electroactivity with the oxidizing potentials in agreement with literature reports [ 52 , 57 ]. Some XAN biosensor studies apply relatively high oxidative potentials (≥+0.5 V) but do not address what species may be contributing to the observed current signal [ 53 , 55 , 59 , 70 ]. This is particularly true in cases where the constant potential applied is +0.7 V and clearly high enough to oxidize the UA being generated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, the development of any electrochemical XAN biosensor must consider both oxygen dependence [ 49 , 50 ] and applied potential dependence [ 18 , 48 , 51 , 52 ] to fully understand the factors generating the observed signal. Some XAN biosensor studies do not address the potential contributions of electroactive species other than XAN even though high positive potentials are being employed during analysis [ 51 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%