2001
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-001-0016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation for professional self-regulation

Abstract: This article asserts that graduate study should include preparation for participation in the process of self-regulation to assure the responsible conduct of research in the scientific community. This article outlines the various ways in which doctoral study can incorporate such preparation. These suggested ways include the inculcation of general attitudes and values about professional self-regulation, various ways doctoral study can be configured so that future scientists are prepared to participate in the det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work in research integrity documents the need for more formal efforts to socialise researchers to professional expectations and values. For example, Braxton and Baird (2001) argue that if future scientists are expected to participate in the deterrence, detection and sanctioning of scienti c wrongdoing, doctoral study must socialise researchers to the role of self-regulation. The need for such socialisation is highlighted by Anderson's (2001) study of doctoral students' conceptions of science and its norms.…”
Section: Moral Motivation and Identity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work in research integrity documents the need for more formal efforts to socialise researchers to professional expectations and values. For example, Braxton and Baird (2001) argue that if future scientists are expected to participate in the deterrence, detection and sanctioning of scienti c wrongdoing, doctoral study must socialise researchers to the role of self-regulation. The need for such socialisation is highlighted by Anderson's (2001) study of doctoral students' conceptions of science and its norms.…”
Section: Moral Motivation and Identity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our findings about faculty knowledge levels and gaps are comparatively unique. While a number of surveys of faculty focus on their perceptions of the incidence of misconduct among fellow faculty and graduate students, few look at the potential for gaps in faculty knowledge and variability in perceived level of importance of specific areas of RCR for academic faculty . Based on our findings, we suggest that a profitable direction for future research is more extensive assessment of faculty knowledge of RCR, similar to efforts to ascertain levels of knowledge of RCR among post‐graduate students…”
Section: Research On Responsible Conduct Of Research In Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The third stage of socialization begins, in this model, when scholars assume faculty positions. Kirk and ToddMacillas (1991) highlighted "turning points" in academic life, and Braxton and Baird (2001) offered a stage-based theory of graduate student careers. Offering a stage model of teaching assistants' learning that acknowledges the non-linearity of the graduate student development process, Nyquist (1989, 1991) hypothesized three stages to their development: "senior learner" early in their graduate experience, "colleague in training" as they become more comfortable as teaching assistants, and "junior colleague" as they become more secure in their new professional identities.…”
Section: How Socialization To Faculty Roles Occurs In Doctoral Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%