2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation, characterization, and properties of monolithic Fe/Al2O3/cordierite catalysts for NO reduction with C2H6

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different from the TPR profile of Fe 2 O 3 , the main reduction peaks of all Fe/Beta samples appeared above 600 • C, which were obvious higher than that of Fe 2 O 3 . According to our previous study [2,25], the TPR peaks of iron supported metal oxides (e.g., Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , and SiO 2 ) at temperature below 500 • C correspond to the reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ in nanoparticles, as well as the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 3 O 4 , which indicated the presence of crystalline iron oxide phases. The difficulty in reducing the iron species implied that the chemical environment of the iron species of Fe/Beta was different from that of supported metal oxides.…”
Section: H 2 -Tprmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different from the TPR profile of Fe 2 O 3 , the main reduction peaks of all Fe/Beta samples appeared above 600 • C, which were obvious higher than that of Fe 2 O 3 . According to our previous study [2,25], the TPR peaks of iron supported metal oxides (e.g., Al 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , and SiO 2 ) at temperature below 500 • C correspond to the reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ in nanoparticles, as well as the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 3 O 4 , which indicated the presence of crystalline iron oxide phases. The difficulty in reducing the iron species implied that the chemical environment of the iron species of Fe/Beta was different from that of supported metal oxides.…”
Section: H 2 -Tprmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…According to our previous work [25,44], Fe 2 O 3 nanorods dispersed on the surface of supports play a crucial role for NO reduction while enhance the complete oxidation of hydrocarbon, then a small amount of excess hydrocarbons is required for achieving a satisfactory NO conversion in the presence of oxygen. Fierro et al [15] reported Fe x O y nanoparticles on over-exchanged Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts are not so effective for the HC-SCR reaction but enhance the propane combustion to CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Giecko et al [15] interpret their TPR curve of Fe 2 O 3 /Al 2 O 3 catalysts assuming that the reduction takes place in two steps, with a peak in the 450-530 ºC zone, attributed to the reduction of Fe 2 O 3 to Fe 3 O 4 and a second peak between 750 and 850 ºC attributed to the reduction of Fe 3 O 4 or FeAl 2 O 4 to Fe 0 . In other cases [35], however, the TPR curve of supported Fe 2 O 3 is interpreted using the reduction scheme proposed by Zielinski et al described above [33].…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Reduction (Tpr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in addition to improving the stability of the catalyst, can increase the surface area. 33,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] In the work reported here, the preparation of monolithic catalysts was proposed using commercial cordierite honeycombs as a structured substrate and alumina-supported iron oxide as active phase. This active phase was chosen because it showed good performance for degradation of organic compounds with hydrogen peroxide, [11][12][13][15][16][17] and also it meets the requirements of low cost and environmental friendliness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%