Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-07746-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and uranium (VI) biosorption for tri-amidoxime modified marine fungus material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These levels are consistent with many data reported in the literature (Keshtkar et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2020a;Ma et al, 2020). This performance is much better than for other supports, where the loss in sorption reached up to 20% at the fifth cycle for functionalized porous activated carbon fibres (Mishra et al, 2015), or 15% for functionalized marine fungal biosorbent (Han et al, 2020). This means that the sorption is stable despite the changes observed in FTIR spectra; these chemical modifications (probably associated with protonation of some reactive groups) are not inhibiting the reactivity of functional groups at the surface of silica beads.…”
Section: Metal Sorption From Pre-treated Leachatessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These levels are consistent with many data reported in the literature (Keshtkar et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2020a;Ma et al, 2020). This performance is much better than for other supports, where the loss in sorption reached up to 20% at the fifth cycle for functionalized porous activated carbon fibres (Mishra et al, 2015), or 15% for functionalized marine fungal biosorbent (Han et al, 2020). This means that the sorption is stable despite the changes observed in FTIR spectra; these chemical modifications (probably associated with protonation of some reactive groups) are not inhibiting the reactivity of functional groups at the surface of silica beads.…”
Section: Metal Sorption From Pre-treated Leachatessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Tri-amidoxime modified marine fungus material had a uranium biosorption capacity of 584.60 mg/g with good regeneration performance. The unmodified biomass originally had a capacity of only 15.46 mg/g [108]. The macroporous ion-imprinted chitosan foams showed an adsorption capacity of 248.9-253.6 mg/g.…”
Section: Uranium (Vi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The C–N stretching vibration, C–H stretching vibration, and C–H stretching vibration corresponded to the peaks at 1043 cm –1 (A region), 1388 cm –1 (B region), and 2928 cm –1 (D region) in Figure i, respectively. The peak at 1633 cm –1 (C region) and 3440 cm –1 (E region) comes from the N–H crooking vibration and stretching vibration, indicating that EDA was bound to the CdS x Te 1– x nanobelts. The XPS spectra of CdS x Te 1– x -EDA nanobelts are exhibited in SI Figure S5–S9. SI Figure S5 shows the XPS spectra of Cd 3 d region over CdS x Te 1– x -EDA nanobelts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%