Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2017.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and performance features of wristband samplers and considerations for chemical exposure assessment

Abstract: Wristbands are increasingly used for assessing personal chemical exposures. Unlike some exposure assessment tools, guidelines for wristbands, such as preparation, applicable chemicals, and transport and storage logistics, are lacking. We tested the wristband’s capacity to capture and retain 148 chemicals including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, flame retardants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic chemicals (VOCs). The chemicals span a wide range of physical–chemical pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
149
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our silicone-air partition coefficients (K silicone − air ) determinations are similar to a previous report of silicone-air partition coefficients (K silicone − air ) in Anderson et al (2017); the percentage difference ranges from 0.97 to 11.4% with larger prediction intervals (Table 2 and Fig. 6).…”
Section: Silicone-air Partitioning Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our silicone-air partition coefficients (K silicone − air ) determinations are similar to a previous report of silicone-air partition coefficients (K silicone − air ) in Anderson et al (2017); the percentage difference ranges from 0.97 to 11.4% with larger prediction intervals (Table 2 and Fig. 6).…”
Section: Silicone-air Partitioning Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…K sa determination as determined in the present study (red line) andAnderson et al (2017) (blue line)…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations