1981
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(81)90417-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of spherical monodisperse silica dispersions in nonaqueous solvents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
324
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 504 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
324
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle size was determined by static and dynamic light scattering in dilute dispersions [8]. The size of the particle was found by static light scattering from a plot of the logarithm of the scattered intensity vs. the square of the wave vector K (a so-called Guinier plot).…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size was determined by static and dynamic light scattering in dilute dispersions [8]. The size of the particle was found by static light scattering from a plot of the logarithm of the scattered intensity vs. the square of the wave vector K (a so-called Guinier plot).…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first condition is typical of the well-known "Stöber method," 32 while in the second case, hydrolysis occurs in inverse micelles formed in water in oil reverse microemulsions. 33 Nonporous SiO 2 NPs produced by both of these methods are of interest for biomedical uses. Applications range from the delivery of conjugated or encapsulated small drugs, proteins, genes, or agents active in photodynamic therapy to molecular imaging by incorporation of contrast agents or photoluminescent dyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When most of the stearyl alcohol was removed the silica was dispersed in cyclohexane and after centrifugation the supernatant was discarded. For further details of the preparation of lyophilic silica dispersions we refer to a forthcoming paper (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the hydrodynamic radius (see next section), this is quite low. We think that this discrepancy is the result of particle shrinkage as a result of radiation (26). The size distribution is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 97%