2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(00)00716-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of Sb2Se3 thin films prepared by electrodeposition for photovoltaic applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
32
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account their corresponding stripping peaks, A2 and A3, and based upon a three-electron process for the reduction of Sb, the coverage for peak C1(C2) is calculated as 0.78 monolayer (ML). This result is similar to that obtained in our previous study on CoSb 3 [23]. The second reductive peak (C3) should correspond to both HER and bulk deposition of Sb.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into account their corresponding stripping peaks, A2 and A3, and based upon a three-electron process for the reduction of Sb, the coverage for peak C1(C2) is calculated as 0.78 monolayer (ML). This result is similar to that obtained in our previous study on CoSb 3 [23]. The second reductive peak (C3) should correspond to both HER and bulk deposition of Sb.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3b, when the cathodic limit of cyclic voltammetry scanning is more negative than −0.40 V, an additional reduction peak C3 is observed at −0.42 V. Furthermore, A1, the stripping peak of bulk Se, decreases with the moving toward more negative cathodic limits. As already reported in literature [31], the C3 peak should correspond to the reduction of bulk Se to Se 2− , according to reaction (3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has received attention as a thermoelectric material, and recently as a light sensitizer in photovoltaic devices because of its narrow band gap of about 1.1 eV-1.3 eV, which approaches the ideal Shockley−Queisser value [24][25][26]. These films have been produced via a number of methods, including thermal evaporation, chemical bath deposition, spray pyrolysis, pulsed laser deposition and electrochemical deposition [25,[27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrodeposition technique has been a promising deposition method to grow thin films. In particular, for absorber films in solar cell, this technique is a perspective competitor because of several advantages such as the possibility for large-scale production, minimum waste of components and easy monitoring of the deposition process 13 . This technique is generally less expensive than those prepared by the capital-intensive physical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%