1997
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.45.1539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Polylactic Acid Microspheres Containing Bovine Insulin by a w/o/w Emulsion Solvent Evaporation Method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
20
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow of water from the internal aqueous phase (w 1 ) into the continuous phase (w 2 ) seemed to exert an insignificant effect on the initial release since the BSA, a model drug in this study, was unable to cross the "semi-permeable" polymer phase due to its size. On the other hand, in a different study on insulin-loaded PLA microparticles, the osmotic pressure gradient induced by the addition of NaCl led to diffusion of the w 1 phase into the w 2 phase, compromising the encapsulation efficiency (Uchida et al, 1997). Going back to our discussion on the initial burst, the difference between NaCl and sucrose in their capabilities of reducing the initial burst seems due to their different contributions to the continuous phase (Jiang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Composition Of Continuous Phasementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The flow of water from the internal aqueous phase (w 1 ) into the continuous phase (w 2 ) seemed to exert an insignificant effect on the initial release since the BSA, a model drug in this study, was unable to cross the "semi-permeable" polymer phase due to its size. On the other hand, in a different study on insulin-loaded PLA microparticles, the osmotic pressure gradient induced by the addition of NaCl led to diffusion of the w 1 phase into the w 2 phase, compromising the encapsulation efficiency (Uchida et al, 1997). Going back to our discussion on the initial burst, the difference between NaCl and sucrose in their capabilities of reducing the initial burst seems due to their different contributions to the continuous phase (Jiang et al, 2002).…”
Section: Composition Of Continuous Phasementioning
confidence: 89%
“…biodegradable polymers such as polylactic acid, polyglycolic acids and polylactic-co-glycolic acid [15,16]. These microspheres, however, are not ideal as their degradation products have been observed to cause an inflammatory response [4,5].…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ES 100 being a pH-sensitive polymer, is soluble above pH 7.0, thus pH 6.4 was selected for the study because if the microparticles are able to sustain drug release at the borderline pH, these will be able to sustain the release at lower intestinal pH values as well. Another biorelevant consideration is that the transit time of a drug through the absorptive area of the gastrointestinal tract is between 9 and 12 h this includes 2-3 h of gastric residence time (18). Thus the capsulated formulations were initially tested for drug release in the simulated gastric pH for 2 h followed by drug release in simulated intestinal pH.…”
Section: In Vitro Drug Releasementioning
confidence: 99%