2020
DOI: 10.3390/pr8040417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Environmentally Friendly Controlled Release Fertilizers Coated by Leftovers-Based Polymer

Abstract: In this work, a novel bio-based polyurethane (PU) was synthesized by using a leftovers (SF)-based polyol and isocyanate for controlled release fertilizers (CRFs). Its chemical structure, surface elemental compositions and distribution were examined by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) and a multifunctional imaging electron spectrometer (XPS). The microstructure morphology of CRFs were examined by SEM. The nutrient release behaviors of CRFs were observed in water. The resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil applied nanofertilizers enable the movement of nutrients in the soil, facilitating its release and penetration into the roots. Controlled-release and slow-release nanofertilizers are used to supply nutrients in suitable concentration to plants over a prolonged interval of time, avoiding the continuous fertilizer application, and reducing the environmental risks (Jiang et al, 2019;Jia et al, 2020;Yoon et al, 2020). Reduction of N losses has been reported using N charged porous nanomaterials, such as zeolites (Manikandan and Subramanian, 2017), clays (Sarkar et al, 2014), or biodegradable polymers such as chitosan (Sharif et al, 2018).…”
Section: Agronomic Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil applied nanofertilizers enable the movement of nutrients in the soil, facilitating its release and penetration into the roots. Controlled-release and slow-release nanofertilizers are used to supply nutrients in suitable concentration to plants over a prolonged interval of time, avoiding the continuous fertilizer application, and reducing the environmental risks (Jiang et al, 2019;Jia et al, 2020;Yoon et al, 2020). Reduction of N losses has been reported using N charged porous nanomaterials, such as zeolites (Manikandan and Subramanian, 2017), clays (Sarkar et al, 2014), or biodegradable polymers such as chitosan (Sharif et al, 2018).…”
Section: Agronomic Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term CRF is generally applied to composts in which the rate, pattern and deliverytime are perceived and controllable through planning. Whereas, SRFs are set apart by supplement discharge at a slower ratein any case, the rate and time of delivery are not controlled (Trenkel, 2010 andJia et al, 2020. These elements might be affected by dealing with conditions like a storage facility, transport and conveyance in the field, notwithstanding soil conditions, for example; dampness content, dissolving and drying, defrosting and freezing and organic activity (Shaviv andMikkelsen, 1993 andShaviv, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRFs are generally produced by coating the conventional fertilizer granule with polymers derived from fossil fuels (i.e., petroleum), such as polyethylene, polystyrene, and resins [4]. Although these materials have been shown to be useful to increase the efficiency of nutrient use and decrease losses, they can be toxic and non-biodegradable, in addition to having a high production cost [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%