1976
DOI: 10.1038/259404a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterisation of an antiserum to the mouse candidate for immunoglobulin D

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in this experiment, pretreatment with a putative anti-mouse 6-chain antiserum [23] had no effect on responses to either an in vitro or an in viyo boost. This result has been confirmed in one other experiment with these clones, in which the anti-Fab (though exceptionally not the anti-p) blocked successfully in parallel groups (not shown).…”
Section: Repeat Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, in this experiment, pretreatment with a putative anti-mouse 6-chain antiserum [23] had no effect on responses to either an in vitro or an in viyo boost. This result has been confirmed in one other experiment with these clones, in which the anti-Fab (though exceptionally not the anti-p) blocked successfully in parallel groups (not shown).…”
Section: Repeat Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The subclass-specific antisera were raised against mouse myeloma proteins, and absorbed with insoluble myeloma proteins of different classes and subclasses, and their specificity was confirmed by radioimmunoassay. The preparation and characterization of the specific rabbit anti-mouse &-chain antiserum has also been described in detail [23].…”
Section: Anti-immunoglobulin Antiseramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiserum had been produced against a purified fraction of SC sIgD by a modification of the technique of Abney et al [35], as described previously [15]. Details of the membrane extract preparation, immunization and absorption procedures and of the assays for specificity have been reported elsewhere [15].…”
Section: Antisera Used For Immunofluorescence Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 gives the distiibntion ol cell surface IgM and IgD on eaeh of these spleen cell populations. Onr restilts show a higher percentage of eells with both IgM and IgD than was found by Abney et al (1976) in adult animals. This is probalily due to differences in sensitivity caused by different optical systems and antisera, together with tlie considerable heterogeneity of brightness of individual ceUs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%