2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5802109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative PET/CT 18F-FDG Standardized Uptake by Lymph Nodes as a Significant Prognostic Factor in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Abstract: Purpose We evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-FDG uptake by suspected lymph nodes (LNs) using 18F-FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients. Methods Patients with CRC underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before radical surgery. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to examine the relationship between recurrence and the 18F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the suspected LNs (SUVLN) on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Results Clinical data, treatment modalities, and results from 90 CR C patients were re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies on the prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with colorectal or rectal cancers have been conducted, in which the cutoff value of SUVmax was set within the range of 1.15-2.5 [22][23][24][25]. Although the present study focused only on the LLN, no signi cant difference was observed in the cutoff values when comparing the results of our study with those of other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Several studies on the prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with colorectal or rectal cancers have been conducted, in which the cutoff value of SUVmax was set within the range of 1.15-2.5 [22][23][24][25]. Although the present study focused only on the LLN, no signi cant difference was observed in the cutoff values when comparing the results of our study with those of other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Forest plots of the pooled sensitivity and specificity are demonstrated in Figure 3 . A comparison between malignant and benign LNMs from 13 eligible studies [ 15 , 18 , 29 38 ] determined that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.65 (95% CI 0.63–0.68), 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.78), 4.57 (95% CI 2.84–7.35), and 0.37 (95% CI 0.28–0.48), respectively. The DOR with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals was 18.00 (95% CI 7.84–41.32) ( Figure 4(a) ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superiority of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in CRC is evident in the detection of lymph nodes and distant metastases and the detection of additional metastases can signi cantly change treatment plans [23][24][25]. However, several studies showed that the detection of metastatic regional nodes was low/moderate using 18 F-FDG PET/CT, demonstrating the limitations of this method [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%