2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative patient factors that predict achieving the minimal clinically important difference following arthroscopic treatment of snapping scapula syndrome

Marco-Christopher Rupp,
Joan C. Rutledge,
John M. Apostolakos
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using an a priori power analysis, performed with G*Power (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), 5 we determined that a total sample size of 34 patients would be needed to detect a clinically relevant difference, such as an MCID of 13.1 points 24 in the ASES score, at a calculated effect size of 1.0 to achieve a statistical power of 0.8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using an a priori power analysis, performed with G*Power (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), 5 we determined that a total sample size of 34 patients would be needed to detect a clinically relevant difference, such as an MCID of 13.1 points 24 in the ASES score, at a calculated effect size of 1.0 to achieve a statistical power of 0.8.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of patients who reached a distribution-based minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using the MCID threshold for the ASES score previously established for the arthroscopic treatment of SSS (11.3 points). 24 Patients who had proceeded to revision surgery were categorized as not having reached MCID, irrespective of the scores before revision. Those patients were not routinely followed up in relation to the index surgery that had failed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%