2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6691966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Nutrition Support May Reduce the Prevalence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with High Nutritional Risk Determined by NRS2002

Abstract: Background. Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a severe complication which may be caused by a perioperative nutrition problem. We aimed to study whether patients with high nutritional risk ( NRS 2002   score ≥ 5 ) might benefit from preoperative nutrition support regarding the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So when referring to preoperative therapy, for patients with advanced age, we must pay attention to both nutrition support and function exercise, to improve long-term nutrition and function problems caused by aging, and increase preoperative reservation, which was defined as “prehabilitation” and needed a relatively longer period ( 36 ). And for cancer patients with nutritional risk or malnutrition, we should commit to increasing intake and improving nutrition status by different support routes even for a short period ( 16 , 37 ). Prealbumin might be a biomarker to monitor the effectiveness of preoperative nutrition support but needs further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So when referring to preoperative therapy, for patients with advanced age, we must pay attention to both nutrition support and function exercise, to improve long-term nutrition and function problems caused by aging, and increase preoperative reservation, which was defined as “prehabilitation” and needed a relatively longer period ( 36 ). And for cancer patients with nutritional risk or malnutrition, we should commit to increasing intake and improving nutrition status by different support routes even for a short period ( 16 , 37 ). Prealbumin might be a biomarker to monitor the effectiveness of preoperative nutrition support but needs further study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores for the final screening take into account all these three sections range from 0 to 7 and classify patients into one of two nutritional risk stages (or groups): at low nutritional risk group (NRS 2002 score < 3), and (moderate/high) risk of malnutrition group (NRS 2002 score ≥ 3). In pancreatic surgery, an NRS2002 score of more and equal to 5 was considered at high nutritional risk with remarkable clinical meaning ( 16 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between risk factors and anemia and postoperative severe complications, respectively, which was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We determined the risk factors by referring to several published articles and what we had in our database, including age, sex, comorbidities, nutrition-related variables, pathology, and some intraoperative items (7,17). We did the logistic analysis of the risk factors of anemia in the total cohort in order to reduce the error caused by missing cases, and we did the analysis of the risk factors of complications in the paired cohort in order to prevent the influence of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between risk factors and anaemia and postoperative severe complications respectively, which was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% con dence intervals. We determined the risk factors by referring to several published articles and what we had in our database, including age, sex, comorbidities, nutrition related variables, pathology and some intraoperative items [7,17]. We did the logistic analysis of the risk factors of anaemia in total cohort in order to reduce the error caused by missing cases and we did the analysis of the risk factors of complications in the paired cohort in order to prevent the in uence of bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%