Optimal peri-operative pain management is one of the key factors to enhance recovery in orthopaedic procedures aiming at early mobilisation. It has demonstrated benefits including decreasing pulmonary and thromboembolic complications as well as facilitating early physiotherapy and rehabilitation [1]. Consequently, we have seen numerous randomised controlled trials (RCT) on different analgesic approaches, but often with limited power to allow definite recommendations. Therefore, as generally accepted, pooling of data from available RCTs into systematic reviews and meta-analyses has become a gold standard [2]. However, at the same time, it has been realised that interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses may be hindered by poor design and inappropriate inclusion of individual RCTs, which may lead to flawed conclusions [3].Often, for some research topics, there appear to be a greater number of systematic reviews/meta-analyses than original RCTs, probably due to the fact that it is easier to perform a systematic review/meta-analysis than perform a high-quality RCT [3]. Unfortunately, even a low-quality systematic review may be published because they are frequently cited which may increase the impact factor of a journal. Consequently, the medical profession, researchers and journal editors are faced with an important dilemma on how to assess the clinical validity of these analyses.This article aims to discuss this problem in detail, using a specific example from the effect of pre-operative glucocorticoids in pain management for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We used TKA because it has inherent challenges to optimise analgesia and facilitate rehabilitation, and where steroids may have interesting positive effects due to reduction of the inflammatory response to surgery thereby reducing pain and fatigue, and apparently without significant adverse effects on wound healing and infections [4].A PubMed search was performed on 2 September 2019 using the following search strategy: glucocorticoid AND hip OR knee OR total joint AND arthroplasty AND RCT or systematic review or meta-analysis. Since 2015, a total of 12 systematic reviews/meta-analyses have been published on the analgesic effects of pre-operative glucocorticoid administration after joint arthroplasty [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Of these, only five [5,6,9,10,16] were prospectively registered and seven studies focused only on TKA [5-10, 16], while five reviews combined trials of TKA and total hip arthroplasty (THA). The TKA-specific systematic reviews/meta-analyses [5][6][7][8][9][10]16] included all the TKA-related trials in the analyses from the combined THA/TKA reviews. Interestingly, several reviews stated that they were the first in the field. Even more interesting, the number of included trials varied between analyses. Thus, the included RCTs varied: n = 4 in [5]; n = 14 in [6]; n = 11 in [7]; n = 6 in [8]; n = 8 in [9]; n = 7 in [10]; n = 4 in [16]; and n = 9 in [17], which could not be directly related to year of publication. Over...