Abstract:BackgroundThe impact of timing of genetic testing on surgical decision making in women with breast cancer and BRCA mutation is not well known.MethodsWomen who were found to carry a deleterious BRCA mutation and had been diagnosed with breast cancer were identified from a database at Beaumont Health. Women who had received BRCA positive results at least a day prior to their index surgery were considered to be aware of their mutation status prior to surgery. Baseline characteristics and surgical choices were com… Show more
“…Clinic-based studies have established that when newly diagnosed breast cancer patients receive genetic testing results prior to their definitive breast cancer surgery, over 50% of mutation carriers opt for immediate bilateral mastectomy (BLM) [14–20]. However, identification and referral of newly diagnosed high-risk breast cancer patients is suboptimal.…”
Although RGCT yielded increased genetic counseling participation, this did not result in increased rates of pre-surgical genetic testing or impact surgical decisions. These data suggest that those patients most likely to opt for genetic testing at the time of diagnosis are being effectively identified by their surgeons.
“…Clinic-based studies have established that when newly diagnosed breast cancer patients receive genetic testing results prior to their definitive breast cancer surgery, over 50% of mutation carriers opt for immediate bilateral mastectomy (BLM) [14–20]. However, identification and referral of newly diagnosed high-risk breast cancer patients is suboptimal.…”
Although RGCT yielded increased genetic counseling participation, this did not result in increased rates of pre-surgical genetic testing or impact surgical decisions. These data suggest that those patients most likely to opt for genetic testing at the time of diagnosis are being effectively identified by their surgeons.
“…Variants in CHEK2 and ATM can impact cancer surveillance and cancer screening, as well as prevention for blood relatives 40,41 . For our patients, the discovery of these actionable germline mutations led to recommendations for increased breast cancer surveillance with the addition of screening breast MRIs (for both ATM and CHEK2 mutation carriers) and more frequent colonoscopies for colon cancer surveillance (for CHEK2 mutation carriers only) 42 .…”
Background: Genetic testing for cancer predisposition is recommended to women with breast cancer who meet the criteria for such testing. After the FDA approvals of the poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, olaparib and talazoparib, for treatment of metastatic breast cancer, carrying germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the genetic testing result has become critical in their care. With the recent FDA approval of alpelisib for the treatment of PIK3CA-mutated hormone-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer, tumor molecular profiling to identify somatic mutations and potential molecularly targeted agents is increasingly utilized in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Aim: Combining germline and somatic sequencing (paired testing) offers an advantage over a single technique approach. Our study evaluates the role of paired testing on the management of breast cancer patients. Methods and Results: Forty-three breast cancer patients treated at Rush University Medical Center underwent paired germline and somatic variant testing in 2015 to 2017. A retrospective chart review was conducted with the analysis of demographic, clinical, and genomic data. Three actionable germline variants were found in the CHEK2 (2) and ATM (1) genes. 95% of tumors had somatic mutations. Seventy-seven percent of tumors had genomic alterations targetable with agents approved for breast cancer and 88% had molecular targets for agents approved for other cancers. Clinical examples of such use are described and potential future directions of tumor and paired testing are discussed. Conclusions: Germline variants were present in a relatively small patient group not routinely tested for inherited alterations. Potentially targetable somatic alterations were identified in the majority of breast cancers. Paired testing is a feasible and
“…The rate of mutations in women who has developed both ovarian and breast cancer was 27.8% and in males with breast cancer, 11.5% (21). Studies have demonstrated that women who know their BRCA status before surgery are more likely to opt for bilateral mastectomy (i.e., contralateral riskreducing mastectomy) than those who do not have this information (22,23). Moreover, the presence of a mutation allows predictive testing of relatives, hence identifying other family members at high risk.…”
Section: Genetic Testing-brca1 Brca2 and Tp53mentioning
Nipple-sparing mastectomy is a valuable addition to the options available for women at high risk of developing breast cancer. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the high-risk genes, , and and the associated guidelines with regard to risk-reducing surgery. We consider other genetic risks and high-risk lesions. We discuss the literature on bilateral mastectomy for breast cancer risk-reduction, and the results of nipple-sparing mastectomy in particular. Finally, we report on patient satisfaction with these procedures and the impact that nipple-sparing mastectomy may have on women at high-risk of breast cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.