1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00221-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative evaluation and predictive value of fine-needle aspiration and frozen section of thyroid nodules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
76
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
76
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar conclusion was made in studies done by Charu Batra et al [1], Fatma Althoubaity [2]. However, study by Boyd L.A et al showed no significant difference in sensi vity, specificity or accuracy between FS and FNA [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar conclusion was made in studies done by Charu Batra et al [1], Fatma Althoubaity [2]. However, study by Boyd L.A et al showed no significant difference in sensi vity, specificity or accuracy between FS and FNA [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Few authors included deferred category of FS in benign group, and suspicious category in benign group in FNAC [25]. In the present series, for sta s cal evalua on, deferred category was excluded from FS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported pitfalls are those related to specimen adequacy, sampling techniques, the skill of the physician performing the aspiration, the experience of the pathologist interpreting the aspirate and overlapping cytological features between benign and malignant follicular neoplasm. [7][8][9] This study aims correlating the cytological diagnosis with the final histopathological diagnosis to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of positive smears, thereby to assess its role in preoperative diagnosis and planning of proper management of Thyroid swellings. Int J Med Res Prof.2016; 2(3); 204-09.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Most studies show accuracy rate exceeding 80%. [12][13][14] Its limitation includes false negative, false positive, indeterminate or suspicious results. 15 The false negative is defined as the patients in which FNAC shows benign pathology but histopathology reveals malignancy 16 , while false positive indicates malignancy in FNAC but histopathology shows benign pathology.…”
Section: Introduction:-mentioning
confidence: 99%