2004
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.025080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer has been extensively studied but data on survival are still equivocal. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in the reduction of mortality in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer. Methods: Computerised bibliographic searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT (1970-2002) were supplemented with hand searches of reference lists. Study selection: Studies were included if they were randomised cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
262
2
28

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 493 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
262
2
28
Order By: Relevance
“…One further study showed a nonsignificant trend in favor of neoadjuvant RCT. Several previous meta-analyses [49][50][51][52] confirmed these results for adenocarcinoma. The metaanalysis by Gebski demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit for both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant RCT [40].…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy In Ut3-4 Esophagogastric Junctsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One further study showed a nonsignificant trend in favor of neoadjuvant RCT. Several previous meta-analyses [49][50][51][52] confirmed these results for adenocarcinoma. The metaanalysis by Gebski demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit for both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant RCT [40].…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy In Ut3-4 Esophagogastric Junctsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In esophageal cancer, a more detailed analysis of postoperative mortality of preoperative RCT showed increased mortality after RCT and resection only for patients with squamous cell carcinoma [62,63], whereas studies that predominantly included patients with adenocarcinoma had no increase or reduction in mortality [46][47][48]55]. In contrast, the metaanalysis by Fiorica showed that RCT in patients with adenocarcinoma increased post-operative mortality (HR 2.88, 95% CI 0.53-15) [49]. However, this was only observed in a study conducted in 1996 that used a form of radiotherapy that is now obsolete and also had other limitations [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, surprisingly few phase III studies have been reported in which preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery was compared with surgery alone. Meta-analyses of these trials showed a small, if any, effect on survival (Kaklamanos et al, 2003;Urschel and Vasan, 2003;Fiorica et al, 2004). In addition, the results of a recently reported study were disappointing, showing no survival benefit for those patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (Burmeister et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the impact of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin on survival is uncertain. An improved 3-year survival was shown in three meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery to surgery alone (Kaklamanos et al, 2003;Urschel and Vasan, 2003;Fiorica et al, 2004), but if the study by Walsh et al (1996) is excluded, this benefit is lost. Furthermore, chemoradiotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin can induce severe toxicity and most patients have to be hospitalised for this treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Fig. 1 Comparison of OS and DFS in group A and B meta-analysis by Florica et al [13], increase in survival was offset by double postoperative mortality while Urshel and Vasant [14] suggested an increase in mortality, with benefit of preoperative therapy seen only after 3 years of treatment. In a study by Bossetet al [15] there was improvement in disease free survival with induction therapy in stage I and II, but low overall survival due to increase in postoperative mortality from 3.6 to 12.3 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%