2013
DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Abstract: BackgroundTo examine toxicity and outcomes for patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for gastric cancer.MethodsPatients with gastroesophageal (GE) junction (Siewert type II and III) or gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by planned surgical resection at Duke University between 1987 and 2009 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local control (LC) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded according to the Comm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GC remains a leading malignancy worldwide, and management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC has not substantially changed in the last few decades. A neoadjuvant strategy may increase the likelihood of completing multimodality therapy, particularly when surgical management is associated with significant morbidity and complications that may preclude timely adjuvant therapy [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a well-established primary treatment modality in other gastrointestinal malignancies including esophageal [9,11] and rectal cancer [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GC remains a leading malignancy worldwide, and management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC has not substantially changed in the last few decades. A neoadjuvant strategy may increase the likelihood of completing multimodality therapy, particularly when surgical management is associated with significant morbidity and complications that may preclude timely adjuvant therapy [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a well-established primary treatment modality in other gastrointestinal malignancies including esophageal [9,11] and rectal cancer [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer can be delivered safely and is well tolerated, with acceptable rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality. 24,25 A meta-analysis from 2013 demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer does not increase treatment related morbidity or mortality. 26 The FTS pathway could therefore be applied cautiously in patients who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two years overall survival (OAS) for all 32 patients was 51.3% (Figure 1), none of the six patients with pCR died during the median follow up period, while 2 years OAS for patients who did without achieving CR (26 patients) was 37.9% (P = 0.0118) ( Figure 2). Microscopically negative margin (R0) is another significant factor for survival as 2 years OAS was 65% for patient achieved negative microscopic margin while none of the remaining 8patients [6] patients had peritoneal deposits and 2 patients had positive microscopic margin], which did not achieve R0 survived for 2 years (Figure 3).…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumours, CROSS trial [3] in which preoperative CRT used it showed survival benefit more than perioperative chemotherapy [5]. The rationale for using perioperative CRT that the radiation field is small and accurate [6] better chemotherapy deliver with intact tumour vasculature also sterilize surgical field and eradicate subclinical metastasis [7]. Two trials have studied the role of the perioperative CRT in potentially resectable gastric tumours; one was done by Eastern cooperative oncology group (E7296), the other was done by RTOG (9904).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%