1992
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420110083017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Chemoradiation and Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Abstract: Chemoradiation prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy ensures that all patients who undergo resection complete multimodality therapy, avoids resection in patients with rapidly progressive disease, and allows radiation therapy to be delivered to well-oxygenated cells before surgical devascularization. Twenty-eight patients with cytologic or histologic proof of localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head received preoperative chemoradiation (fluorouracil, 300 mg/m2 per day, and 50.4 Gy) with the intent of proceedi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
378
0
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 663 publications
(390 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
378
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite significant improvements in operative techniques and mortality rates related to pancreatectomy and the advance of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy, the prognosis for patients with PDA remains unchanged in the last four decades. Neoadjuvant CRT has been increasingly used in patients with potentially resectable PDA and has been shown to improve the survival and locoregional metastatic disease [15,[20][21][22][23]. In this group of patients, the frequency of pCR in subsequent pancreatectomy specimens is largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite significant improvements in operative techniques and mortality rates related to pancreatectomy and the advance of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy, the prognosis for patients with PDA remains unchanged in the last four decades. Neoadjuvant CRT has been increasingly used in patients with potentially resectable PDA and has been shown to improve the survival and locoregional metastatic disease [15,[20][21][22][23]. In this group of patients, the frequency of pCR in subsequent pancreatectomy specimens is largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pCR was defined as area of scarring in pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic soft tissue with chronic inflammation, with or without acellular mucin pools and histiocytic infiltrates, but no residual viable invasive adenocarcinoma cells in the pancreatectomy specimen. These criteria are based on the grading system for the extent of residual tumor proposed by Evans et al: grade I, little (<10%) or no tumor cell destruction is evident; grade IIa, destruction of 10%-50% of tumor cells; grade IIb, destruction of 51%-90% of tumor cells; grade III, few (<10%) viableappearing tumor cells are present; grade IV, no viable tumor cells are present; and IVM, only acellular pools of mucin, but not viable tumor cells are present [15]. Cases with either microscopic or gross viable residual tumor were staged based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7 th edition.…”
Section: Study Population and Histologic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few reports have given a strict definition of pCR to NACRT in PDA. 18,19 However, Zhao et al have recently defined pCR in PDA as the presence of an area of scarring in pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic soft tissue with chronic inflammation with no residual viable invasive adenocarcinoma cells, regardless of the presence of intraductal neoplasms such as PanIN/CIS in pancreatectomy specimens, and found that patients with pCR based on these criteria had a better prognosis than other patients. 16 Zhao et al performed detailed pathological examinations after NACRT and revealed that PanIN3/CIS was present in 5/11 (45%) of pCR cases; 16 PanIN3/CIS was present in both our pCR cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some grading systems for the extent of residual tumor in PDA after CRT, 6,9,[17][18][19] but systems for assessing histological therapeutic effect have not yet been standardized. For example, Evans et al proposed criteria based on the amount of destruction of tumor cells, paying attention to acellular mucin pools, 18 whereas Le Scodan et al proposed classification based on the proportions of degenerative tumor cells present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on survival is not clear. 55,56 Palliative treatment using radiation therapy with low-dose 5-FU as a radiosensitizer increased survival for patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%