2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.jwi.0000201538.37340.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative and Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation with Clinical Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the next step is to determine how patients with these defects will be treated best, but this research has yet to be performed. Indeed, MRI evaluations of women with pelvic floor dysfunction provided significant information that altered clinical management in 41.6% of patients with urinary incontinence in one study [38], and MRI and cystocolpoproctography findings led to changes in the initial operative plan in 41% of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction in another study [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the next step is to determine how patients with these defects will be treated best, but this research has yet to be performed. Indeed, MRI evaluations of women with pelvic floor dysfunction provided significant information that altered clinical management in 41.6% of patients with urinary incontinence in one study [38], and MRI and cystocolpoproctography findings led to changes in the initial operative plan in 41% of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction in another study [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that the utility of demonstrating the specific abnormality in the pelvic supporting structures in the management and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction still must be validated, just as the reproducibility of our proposed analytic approach has to be de-termined. Nevertheless, it is worth mentioning that promising results have been reported with respect to the ability of imaging to change patient care in 41.6% (37), 41% (38), and 75% (39) of patients with different spectra of pelvic floor dysfunction.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static MR images visualize pelvic floor anatomy and defects of the supporting structures, while dynamic MR images visualize pelvic organ mobility, pelvic floor weakness, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and associated compartment defects [ 5 , 8 11 ]. Additionally, MRI may diagnose unexpected underlying masked functional abnormalities, which might be discrepant from the dominant symptom and may influence the choice of the surgical technique in around 42 % of patients with different spectra of PFD [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies and detailed reviews are published about MRI of the pelvic floor and different acronyms have been used for this examination including static and dynamic MR of the pelvic floor, MR defecography or MR proctography [ 4 , 12 , 14 16 ]. However, to date, there is neither consensus on a standardized imaging protocol nor on a systematic reporting scheme for MR-imaging of PFD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%