2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatally diagnosed vasa previa: association with adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that inpatient management will increase the chances to monitor uterine activity and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, and this situation will therefore increase the rate of medical interventions. In our study, however, the timing of the delivery was comparable to other reports [18,[22][23][24], and appropriate intervention seems to have been undertaken to avoid fetal/neonatal exsanguination. The issue of elective hospitalization should be further assessed in prospective studies with a larger patient population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is obvious that inpatient management will increase the chances to monitor uterine activity and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, and this situation will therefore increase the rate of medical interventions. In our study, however, the timing of the delivery was comparable to other reports [18,[22][23][24], and appropriate intervention seems to have been undertaken to avoid fetal/neonatal exsanguination. The issue of elective hospitalization should be further assessed in prospective studies with a larger patient population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Perinatal survival rate is dependent on appropriate prenatal diagnosis and improves from 72% versus 97% when vasa praevia is detected antenatally [ 49 , 50 ]. Even if a correct prenatal diagnosis occurs, almost 70% of newborns receive NICU treatment due to the complications of prematurity [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Transvaginal ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound are the gold standard diagnostic modalities [ 53 ]; however, due to the low incidence of this condition, there are no population screening protocols, and the screening approach is indicated only in high-risk patients [ 55 , 56 ], such as low-lying placenta/placenta praevia, velamentous cord insertion, ART and multiple gestations [ 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if a correct prenatal diagnosis occurs, almost 70% of newborns receive NICU treatment due to the complications of prematurity [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Transvaginal ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound are the gold standard diagnostic modalities [ 53 ]; however, due to the low incidence of this condition, there are no population screening protocols, and the screening approach is indicated only in high-risk patients [ 55 , 56 ], such as low-lying placenta/placenta praevia, velamentous cord insertion, ART and multiple gestations [ 52 ]. Elective Cesarean section should be planned around 35 weeks and not after 37 week’s gestation [ 57 ], and although no significant statistical differences were seen in the rate of neonatal complications between inpatient vs. outpatient management, in the outpatient group, a higher risk of an emergency Cesarean section was reported [ 58 ] ( Figure 16 and Figure 17 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the selection scheme used in this study. First, 1364 studies were identified, and 20 studies met the study criteria for descriptive analysis [ 14 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Two studies reported by Suzuki et al [ 36 , 37 ] used overlapped data (due to overlapping study periods); however, the outcome of interest was different in these studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the study type ( n = 20), all studies were retrospective in nature, 14 were original articles, 4 were case series, and 2 were case reports. Of these ( n = 20), the published years were between 1998 and 2022, and all studies were retrospective [ 14 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. No prospective studies or randomized controlled trials have been reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%