2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal substance exposure diagnosed at birth and infant involvement with child protective services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prenatal cannabis users tended to be younger than 25 years of age, single, and of low parity, compared with nonusers. They were also more likely to have lower income, less than a high school education, and public or no health insurance . Notably, three studies reported changes in the prevalence of prenatal cannabis use across years, suggesting an overall increase in use by pregnant women over time .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prenatal cannabis users tended to be younger than 25 years of age, single, and of low parity, compared with nonusers. They were also more likely to have lower income, less than a high school education, and public or no health insurance . Notably, three studies reported changes in the prevalence of prenatal cannabis use across years, suggesting an overall increase in use by pregnant women over time .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After duplicates were removed, 6542 publications were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 109 were retrieved for full‐text review and 41 studies were included in our scoping review …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis includes an estimated 95% of all live births in California during 2006, excluding births that occurred in military hospitals and at home. These linked data were previously used to evaluate CPS reporting among mothers with a history of documented substance abuse [ 20 ]. This study received human subject approvals from both state (CA HHS #09-12-51) and university (UCB #2010-01-592) institutional review boards and was additionally reviewed by all departments from which data were obtained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 16 research/evaluation articles included three large-scale studies in one state (Prindle, Hammond, & Putnam-Hornstein, 2018;Putnam-Hornstein, Prindle, & Leventhal, 2016) and a single county (Roberts & Nuru-Jeter, 2012) that investigated factors, including type of substance associated with whether newborns were reported to child welfare. Sun, Freese, and Fitzgerald (2007) explored whether the type of exposure was associated with case substantiation and future maltreatment.…”
Section: Type Of Substancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 16 research/evaluation articles, 11 examined newborn populations. These articles described the number of reports to child protection over time (França et al, 2016;Lynch et al, 2018), factors associated with whether reports were made (Prindle et al, 2018;Putnam-Hornstein et al, 2016;Roberts & Nuru-Jeter, 2012), whether these reports resulted in a substantiated case, subsequent maltreatment (Sun et al, 2007) as well as foster care placement (Doris et al, 2006). Program evaluations assessed whether enhanced treatment services for mothers, who were reported to child welfare, reduced the number of newborns prenatally exposed to substances (Ryan et al, 2008) and influenced child permanency outcomes (Huang & Ryan, 2011;McCann et al, 2010;Twomey et al, 2010).…”
Section: Age Of Childmentioning
confidence: 99%