2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal gunshot wound, a rare cause of maternal and fetus trauma, a case report

Abstract: Highlights Trauma during pregnancy is an important cause of adverse fetal and maternal outcomes. Gunshot wounds to the gravid uterus are generally lethal for the fetus, and cause significant morbidity to the mother. Gunshot wounds in a pregnant woman must be handled by a multidisciplinary team. Training in maternal and infant resuscitative measures and surgical techniques are vital.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, 4-8,12-20,23-25,27-36,38-44 few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations