2020
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1814245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal grading of fetal congenital heart disease and its influence on decision making during pregnancy and postnatal period: a prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study demonstrated that the ve most common fetal cardiac defects were ventricular septal defect (24.00%), tetralogy of Fallot (13.00%), aortic coarctation (8.5%), atrioventricular septal defect (6.5%), single atrium and single ventricle (5.5%). Suggesting that septal defect and conus arterial malformations were the major types of fetal CHD, which was consistent with prior studies [10][11][12]. We also found that, of all the cases, only 30.50% (122/400) with single cardiac defects belonged to group A, and most cases were in group B, C, and D, with other cardiac defects and extracardiac abnormalities, which was in keeping with previous studies [7,8,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of this study demonstrated that the ve most common fetal cardiac defects were ventricular septal defect (24.00%), tetralogy of Fallot (13.00%), aortic coarctation (8.5%), atrioventricular septal defect (6.5%), single atrium and single ventricle (5.5%). Suggesting that septal defect and conus arterial malformations were the major types of fetal CHD, which was consistent with prior studies [10][11][12]. We also found that, of all the cases, only 30.50% (122/400) with single cardiac defects belonged to group A, and most cases were in group B, C, and D, with other cardiac defects and extracardiac abnormalities, which was in keeping with previous studies [7,8,11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We applied the clinical prognosis grading system to evaluate the severity of the dominant cardiac lesions and discovered that most cases belonged to Grade -(9.75% in Grade , 40.75% in Grade , 37.75%in Grade ), which have a good prognosis and recommended retaining, and as the rank increasing, the termination rate in each grade gradually rising. A variety of risk categories and grading systems, including our prognosis grading system, have been proven to be helpful in predicting prognosis and facilitating decision-making of fetal cardiac defects [12,32]. Grade refers to normal variation, Grade defects are expected to have effective postnatal surgical or medical intervention and rare postoperative complications, so strongly recommend retaining, Grade lesions have good postnatal surgical treatment results and rare postoperative serious complications, which is recommended retaining, while Grade defects often require staging surgery and have poor prognosis, and comprehensive consultation is recommended to help parents to reach decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%