2011
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal features of Noonan syndrome: prevalence and prognostic value

Abstract: Objective Noonan syndrome (NS) is a common autosomal dominant developmental disorder, mainly characterized by congenital heart defects, short stature, and a variable degree of developmental delay. We have reviewed the prenatal findings in NS and we have correlated them with genotype and postnatal phenotype.Methods The cohort consisted of 47 patients with molecular diagnosis of NS. Prenatal and postnatal phenotypes were assessed by analysis of medical records, and clinical follow-up. Postnatal clinical phenotyp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnosis of Noonan syndrome can also be made with this analysis in fetuses with normal karyotype and findings including pulmonary stenosis, polyhydramnios, and pleural effusions. 375 Other single-gene disorders with familial inheritance may also lend themselves to prenatal genetic testing, although this should be reserved in most cases for instances in which a family member has been previously confirmed to be affected.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of Noonan syndrome can also be made with this analysis in fetuses with normal karyotype and findings including pulmonary stenosis, polyhydramnios, and pleural effusions. 375 Other single-gene disorders with familial inheritance may also lend themselves to prenatal genetic testing, although this should be reserved in most cases for instances in which a family member has been previously confirmed to be affected.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time reduction was of particular importance for prenatal genetic diagnosis. 4 For instance, the results of the screening of the 20 validation set cases were obtained within 5 days: 2 days for target enrichment and library preparation, 1 day for template preparation and sequencing and 2 days for data analysis and interpretation. In contrast, to screen the same 20 cases using Sanger sequencing, 90 days would have been needed: 2 days for target enrichment and enzymatic purification, 60 days to perform 6320 sequencing reactions and electrophoretic runs (158 amplicons per case in forward and reverse sequencing directions) and 30 days for data analysis and interpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3 The diagnosis of such disorders is particularly difficult to perform in utero and in the first years of life, as most features manifest later during childhood. 4,5 Therefore, molecular analysis has become an important key for the verification of clinical diagnosis and represents a highly informative prognostic tool, with direct impact on the establishment of individual follow-up plans. 6,7 Heterozygous mutations in 11 genes associated with the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway have been causally linked to these disorders: PTPN11 (MIM 176876), SOS1 (MIM 182530), RAF1 (MIM 164760), BRAF (MIM 164757), MAP2K1 (MIM 176872), MAP2K2 (MIM601263), KRAS (MIM 190070), HRAS (MIM 190020), NRAS (MIM 164790), SHOC2 (MIM 602775) and CBL (MIM 165360).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These entities, collectively named "RASopathies", share many clinical features, including facial dysmorphisms, a wide spectrum of congenital heart defects, postnatal growth failure, variable degrees of neurocognitive impairment, skeletal and ectodermal anomalies, and increased tumor risk . Prenatal findings include increased nuchal translucency, polyhydramnios, hydrothorax, cystic hygroma, and multiple effusions [Baldassarre et al, 2011;Baldassarre et al, 2013;Croonen et al, 2013]. Despite this clinical overlap, each RASopathy usually exhibits distinctive features, helping in the intricate differential diagnosis Zenker, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%