Prenatal Exposure to Residential Air Pollution and Infant Mental Development: Modulation by Antioxidants and Detoxification Factors

Abstract

Background: Air pollution effects on children’s neurodevelopment have recently been suggested to occur most likely through the oxidative stress pathway.Objective: We aimed to assess whether prenatal exposure to residential air pollution is associated with impaired infant mental development, and whether antioxidant/detoxification factors modulate this association.Methods: In the Spanish INfancia y Medio Ambiente (INMA; Environment and Childhood) Project, 2,644 pregnant women were recruited during their first trimester. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and benzene were measured with passive samplers covering the study areas. Land use regression models were developed for each pollutant to predict average outdoor air pollution levels for the entire pregnancy at each residential address. Maternal diet was obtained at first trimester through a validated food frequency questionnaire. Around 14 months, infant mental development was assessed using Bayley Scales of Infant Development.Results: Among the 1,889 children included in the analysis, mean exposure during pregnancy was 29.0 μg/m3 for NO2 and 1.5 μg/m3 for benzene. Exposure to NO2 and benzene showed an inverse association with mental development, although not statistically significant, after adjusting for potential confounders [β (95% confidence interval) = –0.95 (–3.90, 1.89) and –1.57 (–3.69, 0.56), respectively, for a doubling of each compound]. Stronger inverse associations were estimated for both pollutants among infants whose mothers reported low intakes of fruits/vegetables during pregnancy [–4.13 (–7.06, –1.21) and –4.37 (–6.89, –1.86) for NO2 and benzene, respectively], with little evidence of associations in the high-intake group (interaction p-values of 0.073 and 0.047). Inverse associations were also stronger in non-breast-fed infants and infants with low maternal vitamin D, but effect estimates and interactions were not significant.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that prenatal exposure to residential air pollutants may adversely affect infant mental development, but potential effects may be limited to infants whose mothers report low antioxidant intakes.

Effect of bisphenol A on Drosophila melanogaster behavior – A new model for the studies on neurodevelopmental disorders

“…This sharp increase could be partly attributed to better diagnosis due to improved diagnostic criteria and increased awareness, but it cannot account for the exponential increase. Research studies into prenatal exposure to environmental contaminants such as pollution, proximity to highways, and maternal occupation, have acquired heightened interest as a possible role in the etiology of autism [55][56][57][58][59]. A recent study of identical twins reported that genetics accounted for only 38% of autism risk, with environmental factors explaining the remaining 62% [60].…”

Chronic burden of near-roadway traffic pollution in 10 European cities (APHEKOM network)

“…Moreover, we did not consider the impact of other chronic and acute outcomes also potentially associated with near-road traffic-related pollution and/or regional urban pollution, such as asthma in adults, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, cognitive development in children or reproductive outcomes [5,54]. Asthma is most likely under-diagnosed, thus the prevalence used to derive attributable cases may be too low [33].…”

Exposure to Air Pollution From Traffic and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Swedish Twins

“…Maternal smoking correlates with socio-economic factors such as education and income (Kabir et al, 2011;Laaksonen et al, 2005) and may contribute to this association. The earlier studies (Calderon-Garciduenas et al, 2011;Guxens et al, 2012;Siddique et al, 2011;Volk et al, 2011;Vrijheid et al, 2012;Windham et al, 2006) Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of neurodevelopmental outcomes by residential address-based NO x (black circles) and PM 10 (black hollow diamonds) levels. The spikes represent odds ratios for outcomes of interest and cap lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.…”