2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals and risk of being born small for gestational age: Pooled analysis of seven European birth cohorts

Abstract: Prenatal environmental exposure to organochlorine and perfluorinated compounds with endocrine disrupting properties may contribute to the prevalence of SGA. We found indication of effect modification by child's sex and smoking during pregnancy. The direction of the associations differed by chemical and these effect modifiers, suggesting diverse mechanisms of action and biological pathways.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses suggest that high levels of PFOA and PFOS exposure may lead to substantially increased odds of low birth weight, very low birth weight, pre-term birth, early pre-term birth, and a lower GFR. All of these outcomes are of substantial public health relevance [36][37][38]. We note, however, that these effects are not necessarily additive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analyses suggest that high levels of PFOA and PFOS exposure may lead to substantially increased odds of low birth weight, very low birth weight, pre-term birth, early pre-term birth, and a lower GFR. All of these outcomes are of substantial public health relevance [36][37][38]. We note, however, that these effects are not necessarily additive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Models with zip code controls also include mean household income and racial composition (% Asian, % Black, % Hispanic) low birth weight (< 2500 g) or preterm birth (< 37 weeks), outcomes which have been associated with adverse long-term developmental consequences for the child [36,37]. However, few studies have evaluated associations between PFAS and the likelihood of these adverse birth outcomes directly (exceptions include [10,14,38]), largely due to sample size constraints given the relative infrequency with which such outcomes occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…atmospheric pollutants). A few studies have simultaneously considered more than a couple of families of exposures, relating them to outcomes such as birth weight, [2][3][4][5][6] fecundity, 7,8 type II diabetes mellitus, 9 respiratory health 10 or mortality. 11 The developmental period (from the prenatal period to the first years of life) is considered a particularly relevant exposure window.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, reliance on spot biospecimens causes attenuation bias in the exposure-health association under the hypothesis of classical-type measurement error. 24 At least five exposome-wide studies have been conducted in relation to fetal growth, [2][3][4][5][6] considering up to 57 chemicals from 6 families. 5 From a methodological standpoint, such exposome research raises many challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an increasing number of women active in the labor force in both developed and developing countries, many will work during their reproductive years (5,6) and likely be exposed to a variety of chemicals during pregnancy. Associations between prenatal exposure to EDC and a num-ber of adverse pregnancy outcomes have been reported, including miscarriage (7), birth defects (8)(9)(10)(11)(12), stillbirth (13), small-for-gestational age (SGA) (14), impaired fetal growth (15,16), low birthweight (LBW) (17), and preterm birth (PTB) (18). However, there are limited prospective birth cohort studies to evaluate this association and despite these investigations, evidence of such effects in humans is inconclusive, and many EDC have not yet been evaluated in epidemiological research (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%