2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal exposure to a cannabinoid receptor agonist does not affect sensorimotor gating in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with this idea, we found that treatment with 'typical' antipsychotic drugs, which antagonize D 2 -type dopamine receptors, normalize CSF anandamide levels in schizophrenic patients (Giuffrida et al, 2004). The possibility that endogenous anandamide may act as a downstream signal regulating dopaminergic transmission is further supported by animal experiments showing that the anandamide reuptake inhibitor AM404 attenuates certain behavioral effects exerted by D 2 -type receptor agonists, such as motor hyperactivity, whereas the CB 1 antagonist rimonabant exacerbates such effects (Bortolato et al, 2006;Fegley et al, 2004;Giuffrida et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In agreement with this idea, we found that treatment with 'typical' antipsychotic drugs, which antagonize D 2 -type dopamine receptors, normalize CSF anandamide levels in schizophrenic patients (Giuffrida et al, 2004). The possibility that endogenous anandamide may act as a downstream signal regulating dopaminergic transmission is further supported by animal experiments showing that the anandamide reuptake inhibitor AM404 attenuates certain behavioral effects exerted by D 2 -type receptor agonists, such as motor hyperactivity, whereas the CB 1 antagonist rimonabant exacerbates such effects (Bortolato et al, 2006;Fegley et al, 2004;Giuffrida et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…These results can explain the findings reported in the literature that cannabinoid agonists increase (Stanley-Cary et al 2002), decrease (Nagai et al 2006;Schneider and Koch 2002), or have no effect (Bortolato et al 2005;Bortolato et al 2006a;Bortolato et al 2006b;Mansbach et al 1996;Martin et al 2003) on PPI. Furthermore, corticosteroid effects of cannabinoid agonists on PPI elucidated here may be the mechanism by which chronic cannabinoid treatment in pubertal rats produces changes in adult PPI (Schneider and Koch 2003), since chronic corticosterone treatment has been shown to similarly impair PPI (Ingram et al 2005;Stevens et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…PPI is decreased in rats by drugs that induce psychosis in people, such as amphetamine (Curzon and Decker 1998;Mansbach et al 1988) or phencyclidine (PCP) (Curzon and Decker 1998), although the effects of these compounds or cannabinoids on PPI in humans are inconsistent (Kedzior and Martin-Iverson 2006;Quednow et al 2004;Swerdlow et al 2002;Swerdlow et al 2003). PPI effects of cannabinoids in rats are also unclear with no effects (Bortolato et al 2005;Bortolato et al 2006a;Bortolato et al 2006b;Mansbach et al 1996;Martin et al 2003), increases (Stanley-Cary et al 2002) and decreases (Nagai et al 2006;Schneider and Koch 2002) being reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Oral administration of THC to pregnant rats did not change the auditory startle response of the offspring at adulthood (Hutchings et al 1991). More recent studies confirmed this early finding by showing that prenatal cannabinoid exposure did not affect startle magnitude and sensorimotor gating in the offspring tested at 40, 60, and 80 days of age (Bortolato et al 2006). Together, these studies suggest that prenatal exposure to cannabis derivatives does not affect reflex reactivity to environmental stimuli in the offspring.…”
Section: Long-term Behavioral Consequences Of Maternal Cannabis Exposurementioning
confidence: 65%