1988
DOI: 10.1016/0892-0362(88)90082-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal ethanol exposure in C57 mice: Effects on pregnancy and offspring development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ethanol diet, 15.3 ml (4.49% v/v; 25% EDC) of 95% ethanol was added to the fortified sustacal formula with water to make 320 ml of diet with 1 cal/ml (ethanol). For the isocaloric control diet, 20.2 g Maltose Dextrin was added to the fortified sustacal formula with water to bring it to 1 cal/ml (Middaugh et al, 1988, Middaugh and Boggan, 1995). One day before treatment, the ALC, PF, PF/CLN, and ALC/CLN dams were adapted to the liquid diet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ethanol diet, 15.3 ml (4.49% v/v; 25% EDC) of 95% ethanol was added to the fortified sustacal formula with water to make 320 ml of diet with 1 cal/ml (ethanol). For the isocaloric control diet, 20.2 g Maltose Dextrin was added to the fortified sustacal formula with water to bring it to 1 cal/ml (Middaugh et al, 1988, Middaugh and Boggan, 1995). One day before treatment, the ALC, PF, PF/CLN, and ALC/CLN dams were adapted to the liquid diet.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, pups from dams receiving 20 or 25% of their calories from ethanol from G5 through G18 did not display significantly different activity from controls at P12, P20, P28, or P36 in an open field paradigm [72]. In addition, exposure to 5 g/kg ethanol on P7 in 2 doses of 2.5 g/kg given 2 h apart had no effect on locomotor activity in rats examined in an open field for 35 min at P35 [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, mixed results have been reported on the effects of alcohol during the prenatal period in mice, corresponding to human organogenesis [Becker et al, 1989;Downing et al, 2009;Middaugh et al, 1988;Mothes et al, 1996]. Consensus suggests that it is the initial few days of mouse postnatal growth, corresponding to the first 2-3 weeks of the human brain growth spurt, which dictate the period when the effects of alcohol are detrimental.…”
Section: Prevention Of Fasmentioning
confidence: 94%