2014
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069x-13-72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal drinking-water exposure to tetrachloroethylene and ischemic placental disease: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: BackgroundPrenatal drinking water exposure to tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been previously related to intrauterine growth restriction and stillbirth. Pathophysiologic and epidemiologic evidence linking these outcomes to certain other pregnancy complications, including placental abruption, preeclampsia, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) (i.e., ischemic placental diseases), suggests that PCE exposure may also be associated with these events. We examined whether prenatal exposure to PCE-contaminated drinking w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data used in this analysis were collected for the Cape Cod Family Health Study, a population-based retrospective cohort study initiated in 2002 to examine the effects of exposure to perchloroethylene (PCE) through contaminated drinking water on reproductive and childhood health [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. A detailed description of the cohort has been published elsewhere [ 33 ]. Briefly, women who gave birth to at least one child (identified here as “index” pregnancies) and resided in one of eight Cape Cod towns ( Figure 1 ) between 1969 and 1983 were eligible for inclusion in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data used in this analysis were collected for the Cape Cod Family Health Study, a population-based retrospective cohort study initiated in 2002 to examine the effects of exposure to perchloroethylene (PCE) through contaminated drinking water on reproductive and childhood health [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. A detailed description of the cohort has been published elsewhere [ 33 ]. Briefly, women who gave birth to at least one child (identified here as “index” pregnancies) and resided in one of eight Cape Cod towns ( Figure 1 ) between 1969 and 1983 were eligible for inclusion in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also examined the association between traffic exposure and stillbirth and vaginal bleeding, conditions which may result from placental dysfunction. Lastly, we ran models including stillbirth in the definition of ischemic placental disease, as has been done by other researchers [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective cohort study in women with occupational exposure to organic solvent, the occurrence of a major fetal malformation was increased among women with a risk ratio of 13 (95% CI: 1.8–99.5) [17]. Additionally, associations have been previously reported from this cohort between prenatal PCE exposure and neurological outcomes such as color vision deficits, diminished performance on neuropsychological tests of visuospatial functioning, learning and memory, motor, attention and mood [1820], stillbirths (RR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.01–5.59), placental abruption (RR:1.35, 95% CI: 0,68–2.67) [21], central nervous system birth defects (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 0.9–11.0) and oral clefts (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 0.7–15) [22]. However, few studies have assessed the association of prenatal PCE exposure and PCOS, as well as other adult onset reproductive disorders in women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Epidemiological studies of women with occupational exposure to dry cleaning solvents have also observed positive associations for pregnancy loss [ 22 , 23 ]. However, only a few studies have examined fetal deaths among women exposed in community settings via contaminated drinking water [ 24 28 ]. Two of these studies found increases in the risk of fetal death among highly exposed women, but the results were based on a small number of cases [ 26 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%