2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2022.152059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal diagnosis study using array comparative genomic hybridization for genotype-phenotype correlation in 772 fetuses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, 80.7% (n = 422/523) of all prenatal cases had an abnormal US testing indication, of which 8.3% (n = 35/422) of those cases had pathogenic findings. These findings are consistent with other previous studies with diagnostic yields ranging from 6.5% to 9.6% (Brady et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2022;Patterson et al, 2021;Shaffer et al, 2012) (Figure 2a,b). POC arrays had a diagnostic yield of 16.3% (n = 52/319), 20 of these 52 cases were due to fetal demise and stillbirths, 13 cases were due to missed and spontaneous abortions as expected, while only 12 cases were due to recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL).…”
Section: T a B L Esupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In this study, 80.7% (n = 422/523) of all prenatal cases had an abnormal US testing indication, of which 8.3% (n = 35/422) of those cases had pathogenic findings. These findings are consistent with other previous studies with diagnostic yields ranging from 6.5% to 9.6% (Brady et al, 2014;Costa et al, 2022;Patterson et al, 2021;Shaffer et al, 2012) (Figure 2a,b). POC arrays had a diagnostic yield of 16.3% (n = 52/319), 20 of these 52 cases were due to fetal demise and stillbirths, 13 cases were due to missed and spontaneous abortions as expected, while only 12 cases were due to recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL).…”
Section: T a B L Esupporting
confidence: 94%