2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo interstitial duplication of 14q (14q31.3→q32.12) associated with abnormal maternal serum biochemistry

Abstract: Abnormal maternal serum biochemistry in the second trimester may be a distinctive prenatal feature in pregnancy associated with fetal chromosome 14q duplication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, a total of 96 pathogenic CNVs were detected in CMA results of 75 patients with ND in the state of Santa Catarina, a diagnostic yield of 18%, within the range of 15–20% diagnostic rate cited in literature for patients with ND in other cohorts 5,9,1117 . It is important to highlight that the 75 patients with pathogenic CNVs, included 12 patients of the 17 with previous abnormal karyotype result, for whom the CMA test was requested in order to identify the DNA sequences involved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the present study, a total of 96 pathogenic CNVs were detected in CMA results of 75 patients with ND in the state of Santa Catarina, a diagnostic yield of 18%, within the range of 15–20% diagnostic rate cited in literature for patients with ND in other cohorts 5,9,1117 . It is important to highlight that the 75 patients with pathogenic CNVs, included 12 patients of the 17 with previous abnormal karyotype result, for whom the CMA test was requested in order to identify the DNA sequences involved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The majority of case reports and series of patients with partial trisomy 14 describe postnatal findings, leaving a considerable gap in the understanding of prenatal diagnosis, and management as it relates to our patient. To date, there are only a few reports on prenatal diagnosis of partial trisomy 14q [Duckett et al, ; Chen et al, , ], many of which were terminated. While complete trisomy of chromosome 14 is lethal, pediatric cases of partial and mosaic trisomy 14 have been reported [Lynch et al, ; Shinawi et al, ; Thiel et al, ; Brunetti‐Pierri et al, ; Guilherme et al, ; Qi et al, ; Bose et al, ; Kurtulgan et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial trisomy of the long arm of chromosome 14 is a rare chromosomal abnormality with an extremely variable phenotype ranging from mild to severe degrees of malformations [Duckett et al, ; Sliuzas et al, ; Thiel et al, ; Chen et al, , ; Brunetti‐Pierri et al, ; Dutta et al, ; Guilherme et al, ; Qi et al, ; Sgardioli et al, ; Bose et al, ; Kurtulgan et al, ], while complete non‐mosaic trisomy 14 is a lethal condition. Moreover, chromosome 14 contains a number of imprinted genes, expressed from either a maternal, or paternal homolog.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is phenotypic diversity in females with dup(X) because of functional disomy restricted to the duplicated material on X chromosome (Armstrong et al, 2003), tissue-dependent difference in the X-inactivation pattern between the lymphocytes and other tissues (Volleth et al, 2001), inter-individual difference in the X-inactivation pattern (Morichon-Delvallez et al, 1988), and incomplete inactivation of the dup(X) segment, expression of recessive mutant genes on the active X chromosome, or gene disruption by chromosome rearrangement (Aughton et al, 1993;Sanlaville et al, 2009;Van Dyke et al, 1983). With the advent of aCGH, an interstitial segmental duplication can be easily identified (Chen et al, 2011(Chen et al, , 2013a(Chen et al, , 2013b. This study confirms the power of array CGH in the clinical investigation of the genetic pathogenesis of concomitant primary amenorrhea and mental retardation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%