2019
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal detection of interstitial 18p11.31‐p11.22 microduplications: Phenotypic diversity and literature review

Abstract: Introduction Pure duplication of chromosome 18p is rare, with clinical phenotypes ranging from normal or slight abnormalities to various degrees of mental retardation. It remains difficult to establish a clear genotype‐phenotype correlation. Methods Chromosomal karyotyping analysis was performed on cultured amniotic fluid cells from three cases. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was carried out using the Illumina Human CytoSNP‐12 BeadChip. We also carried out a review of the literature regard… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the 18p11.31p11.2 duplication detected in asymptomatic patient A2 was classified as VUS, and confirmed as deriving from a healthy father. However, previous studies described that this variation is related to short stature, microcephaly and intellectual delay [15]. Hence, patients and family members should be periodically evaluated through genetic counseling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 18p11.31p11.2 duplication detected in asymptomatic patient A2 was classified as VUS, and confirmed as deriving from a healthy father. However, previous studies described that this variation is related to short stature, microcephaly and intellectual delay [15]. Hence, patients and family members should be periodically evaluated through genetic counseling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the chromosome rearrangements identified in our patients are rare, with few cases reported so far. These duplicated regions have been reported as pathogenic and ID is a recurrent clinical finding in the affected individuals [ 16 , 21 , 26 ]. Therefore, we used network analysis in an attempt to identify the potential sharing of biological processes and genes responsible for the pathophysiology of ID in rare duplications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 8q24.13q24.3 duplication identified is a rare chromosomal rearrangement associated with dysmorphic features, growth delay, and ID [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Moreover, variable levels of ID and cerebellum hypoplasia were described in patients with 18p11 duplications, however, few cases of pure duplications in this region have been reported with similar rearrangements so far [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Duplication at Xq22.3q27.2 is a condition with region enriched in genes related to neurological function involving many cases of ID, behavioral problems, holoprosencephaly, and cerebellar vermis hypoplasia [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is considered a first-tier diagnostic tool for these children [2]. Through prenatal diagnosis of CMA, some microdeletions or microduplications can be detected before birth to avoid unnecessary abortions or birth defects [3]. The clinical features of some chromosome 5 microduplications have been described previously [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%