2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal and early childhood exposure to phthalates and childhood behavior at age 7 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding phthalate metabolite urine concentrations measured in our population, only MIbP levels were lower than the LOD in 25.5% of samples, possibly reflecting a lower exposure if compared to other chemicals. MEP, MEHHP, MBzP and MEHP were detectable, and overall, the GM we calculated appeared in the same order of magnitude of urinary amounts of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey study (NHANES), including data from the non-pregnant population of women aged 18-40, except for MEP level, which was lower in our participants (GM: 22.52 µg/L and GM: 152.9 µg/L, present study and NHANES, respectively) [64]. Even considering populations not limited to childbearing age (e.g., general population or pregnant women), concentrations of phthalate metabolites in the present cohort were overlapping data from previous studies conducted worldwide [57][58][59][60][61][62][63], supporting the ubiquitous exposure to those compounds (Table S1, Supplementary Materials).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Regarding phthalate metabolite urine concentrations measured in our population, only MIbP levels were lower than the LOD in 25.5% of samples, possibly reflecting a lower exposure if compared to other chemicals. MEP, MEHHP, MBzP and MEHP were detectable, and overall, the GM we calculated appeared in the same order of magnitude of urinary amounts of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey study (NHANES), including data from the non-pregnant population of women aged 18-40, except for MEP level, which was lower in our participants (GM: 22.52 µg/L and GM: 152.9 µg/L, present study and NHANES, respectively) [64]. Even considering populations not limited to childbearing age (e.g., general population or pregnant women), concentrations of phthalate metabolites in the present cohort were overlapping data from previous studies conducted worldwide [57][58][59][60][61][62][63], supporting the ubiquitous exposure to those compounds (Table S1, Supplementary Materials).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…A study of urban children in the US reported a sex-specific association between maternal urinary MCPP and metabolites of DBP and lower mental development index (MDI) among girls. However, the opposite association was observed among boys [50]. Similarly, prenatal exposure to DBP and BBzP was significantly associated with language delay in children in the US and Sweden [53].…”
Section: Phthalates and Neurodevelopmentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A fair number of longitudinal studies were found, and a wide variety of neurobehavioral outcomes were assessed at various age ranges. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) is widely used in longitudinal studies to assess cognitive and psychomotor development in young children [46,47,50,52,56]. Among the 6 studies that used BSID, 2 studies did not find any significant adverse effects of prenatal exposure to phthalates and cognitive, mental, and psychomotor development of children [46,47].…”
Section: Phthalates and Neurodevelopmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indices (Kim et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2018), motor scores (Torres-Olascoaga et al, 2020), attention (Hu et al, 2017), and internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems (Hu et al, 2017;Daniel et al, 2020), among others. In particular, numerous studies have linked DEHP metabolite exposure of children with an increased risk of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and severity of associated symptoms, with a negative impact of such exposure on regional cortical maturation (Kim et al, 2009;Chopra et al, 2014;Park et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2017; S.M.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%