2009
DOI: 10.1159/000195634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal 3D Ultrasound Diagnostics in Cleidocranial Dysplasia

Abstract: A 34-year-old Caucasian woman with cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) and a known family history of CCD was referred for an ultrasound examination in the first trimester of her second pregnancy. Molecular genetic analysis of the RUNX2 gene was non-informative. A routine 2D ultrasound examination carried out at a local hospital at gestational age 12 weeks showed no signs of CCD. A 3D ultrasound examination in week 15+4 showed a fetus with typical CCD features including large fontanelles, lack of nasal bones, clavicl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…ventricle size) and other abnormalities in infants (e.g. cleidocranial dysplasia and craniosynostosis) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ventricle size) and other abnormalities in infants (e.g. cleidocranial dysplasia and craniosynostosis) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCD spectrum disorder can be diagnosed prenatally. In case of a positive family history, prenatal ultrasound can be used to identify abnormal skull ossification combined with short clavicles in a fetus, to establish an early diagnosis (Hassan et al, 1997;Hermann et al, 2009). However, our patient was not diagnosed during antenatal care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The features of CCD are detectable on prenatal ultrasound examination 11) . A positive family history has been reported in most recorded cases of prenatally diagnosed CCD 5,11,12) . Nonetheless, in this case, there was no family history to predict hypoplastic bone disease, and the only unusual finding on prenatal examination was shorter length of the femur than that expected for the gestational age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%