1973
DOI: 10.1126/science.182.4117.1129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premonitory Variations in S -Wave Velocity Anisotropy before Earthquakes in Nevada

Abstract: Application of nonhydrostatic stress to rock induces velocity anisotropy, causing the S wave to split into two components traveling with somewhat different velocities. Large premonitory changes in the extent of S-wave splitting have been observed for two earthquakes in Nevada. Observations of the difference between the two S-wave velocities may provide a simple method for pedicting earthquakes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gupta (1973) attempted to recognize S-wave splitting in dilatancy zones, but his observational criteria for recognizing Fig. 14(b).…”
Section: P R O P a G A T I O N In M U L T I P L A N A R C R A C K S Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gupta (1973) attempted to recognize S-wave splitting in dilatancy zones, but his observational criteria for recognizing Fig. 14(b).…”
Section: P R O P a G A T I O N In M U L T I P L A N A R C R A C K S Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of the anisotropic zones has been researched by many scientists. Two possible models have been proposed for the explanation of the observed shear-wave splitting: one is the olivine alignment model (Hess, 1964;Sugimura and Uyeda, 1967;Francis, 1969;Fuchs, 1977), the other is the crack alignment model (Nur and Simmons, 1969;Gupta, 1973;Crampin, 1978;Crampin et al, 1980). Seismic anisotropy beneath the ocean is commonly observed and is probably related to seafloor spreading (e.g., Bibee and Shor, 1976;Fuchs, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ideas eventually led to observations of temporal changes (with hindsight) in Band-1 time delays before many earthquakes, including one successful stress forecast of an M5 earthquake in Iceland . Note that Gupta (1973a) had earlier claimed to have observed temporal variations in shear-wave splitting before earthquakes. Unfortunately, Gupta (1973a) had misinterpreted laboratory experiments (Gupta 1973b) and identified crustal observations of shear-wave splitting so far outside the effective shear-wave window that they were completely uninterpretable in terms of our current understanding of shear-wave splitting Crampin 1994).…”
Section: Interpretation-aligned Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%