2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03800-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Premixed bioceramics versus mineral trioxide aggregate in furcal perforation repair of primary molars: in vitro and in vivo study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were in accordance with previous studies (19,20) which concluded that the premixed BC group had better sealing ability than the MTA group . Moreover these results were in agreement with previous studies (8,21) which evaluated the sealing ability of MICRO-MEGA MTA, Endosequence BC, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials using a dye extraction leakage method and concluded that the Endosequence BC showed the better sealing ability when compared with other root repair materials, this was due to the particle size, which allowed the premixed BC material to penetrate into the dentinal tubules and bond to the adjacent dentin easily. They also stated that the probable causes for more microleakage of MTA compared to Wellroot premixed due to the long setting time of MTA ,difficult handling of the material and the presence of voids (8) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were in accordance with previous studies (19,20) which concluded that the premixed BC group had better sealing ability than the MTA group . Moreover these results were in agreement with previous studies (8,21) which evaluated the sealing ability of MICRO-MEGA MTA, Endosequence BC, and Biodentine as furcation repair materials using a dye extraction leakage method and concluded that the Endosequence BC showed the better sealing ability when compared with other root repair materials, this was due to the particle size, which allowed the premixed BC material to penetrate into the dentinal tubules and bond to the adjacent dentin easily. They also stated that the probable causes for more microleakage of MTA compared to Wellroot premixed due to the long setting time of MTA ,difficult handling of the material and the presence of voids (8) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, premixed BC materials have become available on the market in different forms with the same chemical structure. Premixed BCs are highly alkaline (pH = 12.7), so they offer sustained calcium release and ensure their antibacterial activity (8) . Premixed BCs possess the capability of inducing hydroxyapatite formation, indicating their tissue-inductive features (9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management of root perforation is a time-dependent procedure, where hermetic physical seal is crucial to improve the prognosis and survival of the affected tooth [ 32 ]. It has been reported that up to 52–79% of the root canal may remain unprepared, regardless of the instruments or instrumentation technique used [ 33 ], and no currently available irrigation protocol is capable of completely disinfecting the entire root canal system [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques and materials applied for root perforation repair have not been standardized. However, MTA is generally assumed to be a benchmark for sealing various types of root perforations [ 32 ]. MF is one of the newest MTA-based repair materials, which surpasses traditional MTA in terms of clinical applicability due to its superior handling and delivery characteristics as well as faster setting time and thus increased washout resistance [ 10 , 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of the current study is that the use of an in vitro model may not completely recapitulate the exact clinical situation. Several recent studies from 2019-2021 [52][53][54] attempted to compare the sealing ability of different bioceramic materials, but these used dye extraction [52,53] or protein leakage [54] models without any added bacterial contamination. Further in vivo studies will be needed to assess the antibacterial activity of various calcium silicate-based materials in more detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%