1982
DOI: 10.1177/105381518200600108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prematurity, Illness, and Experience as Factors in Preterm Development

Abstract: Increasing concern for the developmental outcome of infants born prematurely has motivated investigation of their cognitive cnd socioemotional development. Some scientists have viewed preterm infants as a homogeneous sample whose major deficit lies in their immaturity and have Included both small-for-dates and premature, appropriate-for-dates Infants as one sample, even though they are biologically distinct and have different developmental outcomes. In addition, recent evidence has highlighted the number of me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study highlights the need for careful definition of the characteristics of preterm infants in developmental research. Preterm infants are not a homogeneous group and investigations of immaturity or the effect or early experience cannot ignore the wide range of medical complications that these infants undergo (e.g., Fox & Lewis, 1980). Indeed, the severity of medical complications seems to be responsible for the increasing morbidity rate found within the preterm group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study highlights the need for careful definition of the characteristics of preterm infants in developmental research. Preterm infants are not a homogeneous group and investigations of immaturity or the effect or early experience cannot ignore the wide range of medical complications that these infants undergo (e.g., Fox & Lewis, 1980). Indeed, the severity of medical complications seems to be responsible for the increasing morbidity rate found within the preterm group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might surmise that the physical and temperamental caretaking demands of the children in the risk group (cf. Fox & Lewis, 1982) were such that typical family resources were insufficient to meet daily child and family needs. Early placement of the child (M= 2.80 years) may have been seen as the best solution for maintaining the integrity of the family unit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%