Premature mortality attributable to socioeconomic inequality in England between 2003 and 2018: an observational study

Abstract

Background Low socioeconomic position is consistently associated with increased risk of premature death. The aim of this study is to measure the aggregate scale of inequality in premature mortality for the whole population of England. MethodsWe used mortality records from the UK Office for National Statistics to study all 2 465 285 premature deaths (defined as those before age 75 years) in England between Jan 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2018. Socioeconomic position was defined using deciles of the Index of Multiple Deprivation: a measure of neighbourhood income, employment, education levels, crime, health, availability of services, and local environment. We calculated the number of expected deaths by applying mortality in the least deprived decile to other deciles, within the strata of age, sex, and time. The mortality attributable to socioeconomic inequality was defined as the difference between the observed and expected deaths. We also used life table modelling to estimate years-of-life lost attributable to socioeconomic inequality.Findings 35•6% (95% CI 35•3-35•9) of premature deaths were attributable to socioeconomic inequality, equating to 877 082 deaths, or one every 10 min. The biggest contributors were ischaemic heart disease (152 171 excess deaths), respiratory cancers (111 083) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (83 593). The most unequal causes of death were tuberculosis, opioid use, HIV, psychoactive drugs use, viral hepatitis, and obesity, each with more than two-thirds attributable to inequality. Inequality was greater among men and peaked in early childhood and at age 40-49 years. The proportion of deaths attributable to inequality increased during the study period, particularly for women, because mortality rates among the most deprived women (excluding cardiovascular diseases) plateaued, and for some diseases increased. A mean of 14•4 months of life before age 75 years are lost due to socioeconomic inequality.Interpretation One in three premature deaths are attributable to socioeconomic inequality, making this our most important public health challenge. Interventions that address upstream determinants of health should be prioritised.

A study protocol for a predictive algorithm to assess population-based premature mortality risk: Premature Mortality Population Risk Tool (PreMPoRT)

“…For example, in recent years, premature mortality rates have stagnated in Canada [ 7 ] and appear to be increasing in the USA [ 8 ] and Europe [ 9 , 10 ] after historically experiencing steady declines. Gaps in premature mortality across socioeconomic status are widening both in Canada [ 11 – 15 ] and internationally [ 16 – 18 ]. Additionally, premature mortality rates can be used to compare population health status between groups, regions, and health systems [ 4 ].…”

The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on dementia mortality, age at death and quality of diagnosis: a nationwide death records study in England and Wales 2001-2017

“…Persistent and widening socioeconomic inequality in the United Kingdom is associated with negative health outcomes including excess premature mortality in those who are more deprived (1) . However, the effect of this on dementia mortality across the United Kingdom has not been systematically examined.…”

Inequalities in 2020: time for a health strategy that unites the country

“…Peter English is right to stress the importance of tackling the ubiquitous problem of inequalities and to highlight interventions that could make a significant improvement to the country’s health 1. A wealth of evidence linking deprivation with poor health has now accumulated and the excellent Lancet study adds further weight to this research 2…”