2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary testing using Mokken scaling of an Italian translation of the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia (EdFED-I) scale

Abstract: The EdFED-I shows reasonable psychometric properties and can be used for the assessment of feeding difficulty in Italian samples of older people with dementia. However, further work with larger samples is required to test the utility of the whole range of items and the necessity of their inclusion in the EdFED-I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(34 reference statements)
3
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the item about turning the head away (Item 6) scaled well, it did not show IIO; unlike the 4 remaining items, which scored invariantly across the whole study. This invariance in score ordering reflects previous studies [10,11] - while differing slightly from the previous EdFED-I scale study [11] - and shows that leaving food in the mouth and allowing it to fall out (Item 9) is the most difficult item in the EdFED-I scale, in accordance with the original EdFED scale [11], suggesting that this indicates a very serious level of difficulty with feeding. The utility of these observations will be discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While the item about turning the head away (Item 6) scaled well, it did not show IIO; unlike the 4 remaining items, which scored invariantly across the whole study. This invariance in score ordering reflects previous studies [10,11] - while differing slightly from the previous EdFED-I scale study [11] - and shows that leaving food in the mouth and allowing it to fall out (Item 9) is the most difficult item in the EdFED-I scale, in accordance with the original EdFED scale [11], suggesting that this indicates a very serious level of difficulty with feeding. The utility of these observations will be discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This suggests that, similar to other versions of the EdFED scale, the EdFED-I scale contains 2 sets of items identifiable by Mokken scaling: those concerned with the indicators and feeding difficulty and nursing interventions and those concerned with the feeding-related behaviors in dementia. As in a previous study [11], the items related to nursing interventions score highest and show a ceiling effect. However, unlike the previous study - where the indicators of feeding difficulty also scored high and higher than all behavioral items - in the present study, the item related to spillage (Item 3) shows a floor effect, and the item related to leaving food on the plate (Item 4) scores in the middle region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, dysphagia also increases workload and can be distressing both for the patient's family members and for the nurses who care for them, and ultimately increase the levels of burnout in nursing home staff (Bagnasco et al., ). Therefore, assessing the nutritional status with an integrated approach and appropriate tools is fundamental to effectively prevent malnutrition (Liu et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%