2016
DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.jsri.13.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Test and ‎‎Shrinkage Estimations of Scale Parameters for Two Exponential Distributions based on Record Values

Abstract: The exponential distribution is applied in a very wide variety of statistical procedures.Among the most prominent applications are those in the field of life testing and reliability theory. When there are two record samples available for estimating the scale parameter, a preliminary test is usually used to determine whether to pool the samples or use the individual sample. In this paper, the preliminary test estimator and shrinkage estimator are studied. The optimum level of significance for preliminary test e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[31] has found the shrinkage estimate of the parameters of exponential distribution. [32], [33], [34] obtain the Shrinkage estimation in the context of exponential distribution. [35] obtained the shrinkage estimator of stress strength reliability R = P [X < Y ] when X and Y are geometric distributions using record values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] has found the shrinkage estimate of the parameters of exponential distribution. [32], [33], [34] obtain the Shrinkage estimation in the context of exponential distribution. [35] obtained the shrinkage estimator of stress strength reliability R = P [X < Y ] when X and Y are geometric distributions using record values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details, see Nevzorov (1988), Ahsanullah (1995) and Arnold et al (1998). For some recent references, see Asgharzadeh et al (2013), Mirfarah and Ahmadi (2014) and Zakerzadeh et al (2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%