Preliminary study on nanoparticle sizes under the APEC technology cooperative framework

Abstract

Despite the fact that there exist several techniques capable of characterizing nanoparticle sizes, their measurement results from the same sample often deviate from each other by an amount that is considered significant on the nanometre scale. In the absence of international standards, or worldwide recognized protocols dealing with nanoparticle characterization, an APEC-led preliminary interlaboratory comparison on nanoparticle size characterization was carried out among ten laboratories from six member economies. Test samples of nanoparticles of 20 nm and 100 nm nominal sizes were distributed for measurements by dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microcopy (AFM) and differential mobility analyser (DMA). The comparison result showed fair agreement among the measurements on the certified reference materials (CRM) of 20 nm and 100 nm nanoparticles. Greater deviation was observed on the 20 nm nanosilver colloid sample. This comparison was regarded as a preliminary study on the measurement consistency among various nanoscale measurement techniques.

Reversible aggregation of gold nanoparticles induced by pH dependent conformational transitions of a self-assembled polypeptide

“…4a are smaller than the DLS measurement but a direct comparison between the two techniques is complicated by factors such as sample size, sensitivity to hydrodynamic conditions in DLS measurements, etc. [40,41]. The GNP-SSPLGA are fairly welldispersed as isolated particles in the sample deposited at high pH (Fig.…”

Characterization of silver nanoparticles using flow-field flow fractionation interfaced to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

“…To date there have been few measurements of manufactured nanoparticles in natural waters or soils because of the extreme difficulty in detecting those at environmentally relevant concentrations [20,21] while avoiding the potential interference of natural nanoparticles frequently present in environmental samples [22]. It has been reported that the average size and size distribution of nanoparticles can significantly vary when comparing results from different techniques [23]. Each technique is not without limitations and, therefore inaccurate predictions of material properties and structure can result.…”

Nanoparticles in Foods, Determination of

“…For example, one of the most challenging steps in TEM is preparation of a sample sufficiently thin to allow the electrons to pass through. (108,110,111) More complex food samples are embedded in resin and cut into 15-90 nm thin sections by means of ultramicrotomy or focused ion beam (FIB) milling. Liquid samples are prepared as resin-embedded specimens without sectioning by adding a water-soluble melamine resin (e.g.…”