1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70083-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbar spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There seems to be a general tendency towards higher intraobserver reliability compared to interobserver results. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The present results point somewhat in the same direction. In a recent systematic review of the literature on this topic, higher reproducibility of regional compared to segmental manual mobilizations has been reported.…”
Section: Discussion Reproducibilitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…There seems to be a general tendency towards higher intraobserver reliability compared to interobserver results. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] The present results point somewhat in the same direction. In a recent systematic review of the literature on this topic, higher reproducibility of regional compared to segmental manual mobilizations has been reported.…”
Section: Discussion Reproducibilitysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This could not be concluded from a previous test of precise diagnosis of segmental dysfunctions because of low to moderate kappa values in the range 0.27-0.47 [5]. Although a significant inter-observer association was demonstrated, the two examiners had somewhat different approaches to the examination as exemplified by the systematic variation in the levels of diagnosis, which is also experienced in former studies [5,8]. This is reflected in the clinical experience of different treatment strategies, and as long as no 'bottom line' method for examination has been found, no general guidelines for manual therapy can be given.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Very few results have been presented to support the possibility of an exact clinical diagnosis of a more specific pathology in the low back [21]. To a certain degree, this contrasts the fact that segmental manipulation based on such examination is a well accepted and effective therapy of LBP [8,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawk et al have found that subjective techniques such as manual palpation yield little consensus between practitioners [6]. It was found that inexperienced examiners were more likely to diagnose a greater number of subluxations in pain free patients than their more experienced counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%